Hi Gyula, Great questions, I’ll track these topics in our docs accordingly as well.
> - What will be the naming convention for the created FlinkDeployment A/B? > Should we introduce some logic for the users to control this? Currently, the controller takes the original resource name as the main prefix and adds the “-a” or “-b” suffixes (in an alternating fashion) to distinguish them. We could switch this to a numeric pattern. We could indeed allow the user to have some control on the deployments’ name prefixes or even the _type_ of suffixes. Thoughts? > - Can the user "turn" and existing FlinkDeployment into a Blue / Green > deployment? This is a very good idea, we could introduce a “flag” in the CRD that would instruct the controller to treat an existing FlinkDeployment as an “-a” type and proceed redeploying it as a Blue/Green instead. > - Did you consider alternative names for this CR? This is one of the most open topics, some other ideas were “Active/Standby” or “Rolling Deployments”… “Blue/Green” simply stuck a bit more. Any other suggestions? Thanks, Sergio > On Feb 9, 2025, at 5:17 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Sergio! > > I think this will be a great addition to the operator and is a feature > request that comes up again and again. > > Some minor comments/question: > - What will be the naming convention for the created FlinkDeployment A/B? > Should we introduce some logic for the users to control this? > - Can the user "turn" and existing FlinkDeployment into a Blue / Green > deployment? > - Did you consider alternative names for this CR? > > Cheers, > Gyula > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 6:00 PM Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Eric, >> >> The link is fixed and the FLIP contains everything from the google doc, I >> updated the link there as well. >> >> Thanks >> Gyula >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 5:55 PM Eric Xiao <eric.x...@decodable.co.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Sergio, >>> >>> Can you update the Phase 1 Google Doc's sharing permissions? I also >>> believe >>> the link in the FLIP leads to an internal Apple tool: >>> >>> https://quip-apple.com/account/login?next=https%3A%2F%2Fquip-apple.com%2F7BpiAdeZ7Ow3 >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:15 PM Sergio Chong Loo >>> <schong...@apple.com.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> FLIP-503: >>>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337677648 >>>> >>>> - Sergio >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jan 13, 2025, at 2:39 PM, Sergio Chong Loo <schong...@apple.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi folks, >>>>> >>>>> As proposed in [1] we would like to more formally continue the >>>> discussion to add Blue/Green deployments support to Flink via the >>>> Kubernetes Operator. >>>>> >>>>> For clarity and easier review experience we’ve separated this effort >>>> into 2 phases: >>>>> >>>>> 1) Blue/Green Deployments for Flink on Kubernetes: Phase 1 (basic) - >>>> THIS FLIP >>>>> >>>>> 2) Blue/Green Deployments for Flink on Kubernetes: Phase 2 (with >>>> Coordination) - in its corresponding FLIP/email, which will follow >>> shortly >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Phase 1 Google Doc: >>>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/159I9kPmHkPMNoKp7iIgntMZjrGz5J2_svOfuaNvV5HA/edit?pli=1&tab=t.0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks everyone in advance, we’re really excited to bring this feature >>>> to the community! >>>>> >>>>> - Sergio >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/m2sqgz455fzlvp0h9kbs1zmc5gj2s162 >>>> >>>> >>> >>
