@Gyula, Thanks for the input, I also second the “blue/green” naming convention; and yes none of the colors is meant to have any meaning or purpose other than distinction.
@Alexis, Indeed, so far the proposal/doc suggests a FlinkBlueGreenDeployment CRD Sergio > On Mar 6, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Alexis Sarda-Espinosa <sarda.espin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I had also thought about this kind of functionality in the past and I'm > very interested to see how it works out. I had imagined something like a > FlinkContinuousDeployment as CRD, just putting it out there. > > Regards, > Alexis. > > On Thu, 6 Mar 2025, 17:31 Gyula Fóra, <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I think we should consider either FlinkAbDeployment or >> FlinkBlueGreenDeployment as a name and then label deployments and states >> with a/b or blue/green accordingly. >> >> I have a slight preference for blue green as it sounds a bit nicer and more >> descriptive but it depends a bit whether the concept has any strong >> relation with what should be the active one (does green always have to be >> the "new" one)? >> >> In any case I think the proposal is pretty clear and we should go ahead >> with this if there are no more discussion points from the community :) >> >> I can start the vote on monday. >> >> Cheers, >> Gyula >> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 4:03 PM Sergio Chong Loo >> <schong...@apple.com.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gyula, >>> >>> Great questions, I’ll track these topics in our docs accordingly as well. >>> >>>> - What will be the naming convention for the created FlinkDeployment >> A/B? >>>> Should we introduce some logic for the users to control this? >>> >>> >>> Currently, the controller takes the original resource name as the main >>> prefix and adds the “-a” or “-b” suffixes (in an alternating fashion) to >>> distinguish them. We could switch this to a numeric pattern. >>> >>> We could indeed allow the user to have some control on the deployments’ >>> name prefixes or even the _type_ of suffixes. Thoughts? >>> >>>> - Can the user "turn" and existing FlinkDeployment into a Blue / Green >>>> deployment? >>> >>> This is a very good idea, we could introduce a “flag” in the CRD that >>> would instruct the controller to treat an existing FlinkDeployment as an >>> “-a” type and proceed redeploying it as a Blue/Green instead. >>> >>>> - Did you consider alternative names for this CR? >>> >>> This is one of the most open topics, some other ideas were >>> “Active/Standby” or “Rolling Deployments”… “Blue/Green” simply stuck a >> bit >>> more. Any other suggestions? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sergio >>> >>> >>>> On Feb 9, 2025, at 5:17 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Sergio! >>>> >>>> I think this will be a great addition to the operator and is a feature >>>> request that comes up again and again. >>>> >>>> Some minor comments/question: >>>> - What will be the naming convention for the created FlinkDeployment >> A/B? >>>> Should we introduce some logic for the users to control this? >>>> - Can the user "turn" and existing FlinkDeployment into a Blue / Green >>>> deployment? >>>> - Did you consider alternative names for this CR? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Gyula >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 6:00 PM Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Eric, >>>>> >>>>> The link is fixed and the FLIP contains everything from the google >> doc, >>> I >>>>> updated the link there as well. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Gyula >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 5:55 PM Eric Xiao <eric.x...@decodable.co >>> .invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sergio, >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you update the Phase 1 Google Doc's sharing permissions? I also >>>>>> believe >>>>>> the link in the FLIP leads to an internal Apple tool: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >> https://quip-apple.com/account/login?next=https%3A%2F%2Fquip-apple.com%2F7BpiAdeZ7Ow3 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:15 PM Sergio Chong Loo >>>>>> <schong...@apple.com.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> FLIP-503: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337677648 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Sergio >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jan 13, 2025, at 2:39 PM, Sergio Chong Loo <schong...@apple.com >>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As proposed in [1] we would like to more formally continue the >>>>>>> discussion to add Blue/Green deployments support to Flink via the >>>>>>> Kubernetes Operator. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For clarity and easier review experience we’ve separated this >> effort >>>>>>> into 2 phases: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1) Blue/Green Deployments for Flink on Kubernetes: Phase 1 (basic) >> - >>>>>>> THIS FLIP >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2) Blue/Green Deployments for Flink on Kubernetes: Phase 2 (with >>>>>>> Coordination) - in its corresponding FLIP/email, which will follow >>>>>> shortly >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Phase 1 Google Doc: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/159I9kPmHkPMNoKp7iIgntMZjrGz5J2_svOfuaNvV5HA/edit?pli=1&tab=t.0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks everyone in advance, we’re really excited to bring this >>> feature >>>>>>> to the community! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Sergio >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/m2sqgz455fzlvp0h9kbs1zmc5gj2s162 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>
