@Leonard @Martijn Following up on @Claire question, what is the role of Bahir (https://bahir.apache.org/) in this scenario?
I am also trying to understand how connectors fir in the Flink project scenario :) Thank you, Lorenzo On Apr 2, 2024 at 06:13 +0200, Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com>, wrote: > Hey, Claire > > Thanks starting this discussion, all flink external connector repos are > sub-projects of Apache Flink, including > https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-aws. > > Creating a flink external connector repo named flink-connectors-gcp as > sub-project of Apache Beam is not a good idea from my side. > > > Currently, we have no Flink committers on our team. We are actively > > involved in the Apache Beam community and have a number of ASF members on > > the team. > > Not having Flink committer should not be a strong reason in this case, Flink > community welcome contributors to contribute and maintain the connectors, as > a contributor, through continuous connector development and maintenance work > in the community, you will also have the opportunity to become a Committer. > > Best, > Leonard > > > > 2024年2月14日 上午12:24，Claire McCarthy <clairemccar...@google.com.INVALID> 写道： > > > > Hi Devs! > > > > I’d like to kick off a discussion on setting up a repo for a new fleet of > > Google Cloud connectors. > > > > A bit of context: > > > > - > > > > We have a team of Google engineers who are looking to build/maintain > > 5-10 GCP connectors for Flink. > > - > > > > We are wondering if it would make sense to host our connectors under the > > ASF umbrella following a similar repo structure as AWS ( > > https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-aws). In our case: > > apache/flink-connectors-gcp. > > - > > > > Currently, we have no Flink committers on our team. We are actively > > involved in the Apache Beam community and have a number of ASF members on > > the team. > > > > > > We saw that one of the original motivations for externalizing connectors > > was to encourage more activity and contributions around connectors by > > easing the contribution overhead. We understand that the decision was > > ultimately made to host the externalized connector repos under the ASF > > organization. For the same reasons (release infra, quality assurance, > > integration with the community, etc.), we would like all GCP connectors to > > live under the ASF organization. > > > > We want to ask the Flink community what you all think of this idea, and > > what would be the best way for us to go about contributing something like > > this. We are excited to contribute and want to learn and follow your > > practices. > > > > A specific issue we know of is that our changes need approval from Flink > > committers. Do you have a suggestion for how best to go about a new > > contribution like ours from a team that does not have committers? Is it > > possible, for example, to partner with a committer (or a small cohort) for > > tight engagement? We also know about ASF voting and release process, but > > that doesn't seem to be as much of a potential hurdle. > > > > Huge thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts! > > > > > > Claire >
