Very thanks @Xintong and everyone! I'll merge the remaining PRs~ Very sorry for
the inconvinient brought. 

Best,
Yun



 ------------------Original Mail ------------------
Sender:Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com>
Send Date:Fri Aug 20 09:43:24 2021
Recipients:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>, Yun Gao <yungao...@aliyun.com>
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Merge the Last Piece of FLIP-147 After Code Freeze

I think we are good to go on this, since there's no objections within 48h.
Thank you~
Xintong Song


On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 5:11 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote:

For the record, this has been brought up on the release testing sync earlier 
today, without objections from the meeting. Per the previous email [1], we 
brought this to the mailing list discussion. 

If you need to merge a new feature after the freeze, please open a discussion 
on the dev@ list. If there are no objections by a PMC member within 48 
(workday) hours, the feature can be merged.

Thank you~
Xintong Song

[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc6cd39f467c42873ca2e9fa31dbe117c267d22ee3aa69bd8071219ff%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:43 PM Yun Gao <yungao...@aliyun.com.invalid> wrote:
Hi all,

Since Flink 1.14 is already code freeze, but for FLIP-147 we still have the 
last piece of work left,
thus we would like to start a discussion about merging them after code freeze. 

Currently there are two non-bug-fix issues left and since
1. FLINK-23512: The PR is in fact approved before code freeze, but we failed to 
get a green CI test
before code freeze; and it mainly added a check to illegal job graph 
modification with finished state, 
which should only have a limit affection.
2. FLINK-21090: The PR complements the ITCase for the final checkpoint 
functionality, currently it is 
blocked by several on-going small bug fixes. This should not affect the normal 
processes.

Thus if no objections we would tend to merge them to complete FLIP-147. 

Very thanks everyone!

Best,
Yun

Reply via email to