I think we are good to go on this, since there's no objections within 48h. Thank you~
Xintong Song On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 5:11 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote: > For the record, this has been brought up on the release testing sync > earlier today, without objections from the meeting. Per the previous email > [1], we brought this to the mailing list discussion. > > If you need to merge a new feature after the freeze, please open a >> discussion on the dev@ list. If there are no objections by a PMC member >> within 48 (workday) hours, the feature can be merged. >> > > Thank you~ > > Xintong Song > > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc6cd39f467c42873ca2e9fa31dbe117c267d22ee3aa69bd8071219ff%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:43 PM Yun Gao <yungao...@aliyun.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Since Flink 1.14 is already code freeze, but for FLIP-147 we still have >> the last piece of work left, >> thus we would like to start a discussion about merging them after code >> freeze. >> >> Currently there are two non-bug-fix issues left and since >> 1. FLINK-23512: The PR is in fact approved before code freeze, but we >> failed to get a green CI test >> before code freeze; and it mainly added a check to illegal job graph >> modification with finished state, >> which should only have a limit affection. >> 2. FLINK-21090: The PR complements the ITCase for the final checkpoint >> functionality, currently it is >> blocked by several on-going small bug fixes. This should not affect the >> normal processes. >> >> Thus if no objections we would tend to merge them to complete FLIP-147. >> >> Very thanks everyone! >> >> Best, >> Yun > >
