+1 for releasing StateFun 2.2 with Sep. 10th as feature freeze date. Thanks
for driving this Igal!

Best Regards,
Yu


On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1, 10 Sept. also sounds like a reasonable feature freeze date considering
> that most proposed features are already either merged or PR in progress.
>
> Cheers,
> Gordon
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:55 PM Marta Paes Moreira <ma...@ververica.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > The feature set also seems quite in line with user feedback, which is
> > always great to see.
> >
> > Thanks, Igal!
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:34 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 to release Statefun 2.2
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:16 PM David Anderson <da...@alpinegizmo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Igal,
> > > >
> > > > The feature set you propose sounds great to me -- as a user I see
> > > > plenty there to get excited about. As for the feature freeze date, I
> > > > don't really have an informed opinion.
> > > >
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:15 AM Igal Shilman <i...@ververica.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Flink devs,
> > > > >
> > > > > We have a few upcoming / implemented features for Stateful
> Functions
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > radar, and would like to give a heads up on what to expect for the
> > next
> > > > > release:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Upgrade support for Flink 1.11.x. [FLINK-18812]
> > > > > 2. Fine grained control on remote state configuration, such as
> state
> > > TTL.
> > > > > [FLINK-17954]
> > > > > 3. New state construct for dynamic state registration [FLINK-18316]
> > > > > 4. Add a DataStream API to StateFun [FLINK-19001]
> > > > > 5. Support async handlers for the Python SDK [FLINK-18518]
> > > > > 6. Add more metrics around async operations and backpressure
> > > > [FLINK-19020]
> > > > > 7. Out-of-box support for common storage systems in flink-statefun
> > > Docker
> > > > > image [FLINK-19019]
> > > > >
> > > > > With these we think the project will be in a good spot for the next
> > > > release.
> > > > > What do you think about aiming at 10.9.2020 for a feature freeze
> for
> > > > > StateFun 2.2?
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > Igal.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to