+1, 10 Sept. also sounds like a reasonable feature freeze date considering that most proposed features are already either merged or PR in progress.
Cheers, Gordon On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:55 PM Marta Paes Moreira <ma...@ververica.com> wrote: > +1 > > The feature set also seems quite in line with user feedback, which is > always great to see. > > Thanks, Igal! > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:34 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > +1 to release Statefun 2.2 > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:16 PM David Anderson <da...@alpinegizmo.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Igal, > > > > > > The feature set you propose sounds great to me -- as a user I see > > > plenty there to get excited about. As for the feature freeze date, I > > > don't really have an informed opinion. > > > > > > David > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:15 AM Igal Shilman <i...@ververica.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Flink devs, > > > > > > > > We have a few upcoming / implemented features for Stateful Functions > on > > > the > > > > radar, and would like to give a heads up on what to expect for the > next > > > > release: > > > > > > > > 1. Upgrade support for Flink 1.11.x. [FLINK-18812] > > > > 2. Fine grained control on remote state configuration, such as state > > TTL. > > > > [FLINK-17954] > > > > 3. New state construct for dynamic state registration [FLINK-18316] > > > > 4. Add a DataStream API to StateFun [FLINK-19001] > > > > 5. Support async handlers for the Python SDK [FLINK-18518] > > > > 6. Add more metrics around async operations and backpressure > > > [FLINK-19020] > > > > 7. Out-of-box support for common storage systems in flink-statefun > > Docker > > > > image [FLINK-19019] > > > > > > > > With these we think the project will be in a good spot for the next > > > release. > > > > What do you think about aiming at 10.9.2020 for a feature freeze for > > > > StateFun 2.2? > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Igal. > > > > > >
