+1 (non-binding)

- checked the checksum and signature
- installed PyFlink package on MacOS and run some tests

Regards,
Dian

> 在 2020年7月20日,上午11:11,Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> +1 (non-binding) 
> 
> I found that the fix version of FLINK-18544 is 1.11.1, and the release did 
> not contain it. I think we should fix it in the release note.
> 
> checked 
> - build from source, ok
> - sha512 sum, ok
> - gpg key, ok
> - License seem ok(checked the change of all pom.xml between 1.11.0 and 1.11.1 
> https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.11.0..release-1.11.1-rc1 
> <https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.11.0..release-1.11.1-rc1>
> - Run some demo locally
> 
> Best,
> Congxian
> 
> 
> Rui Li <lirui.fu...@gmail.com <mailto:lirui.fu...@gmail.com>> 于2020年7月18日周六 
> 下午7:04写道:
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> - Built from source
> - Verified hive connector tests for all hive versions
> - Played some simple cases with hive connector and everything seems fine
> 
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:24 AM Rui Li <lirui.fu...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:lirui.fu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> > OK, I agree FLINK-18588 can wait for the next release.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:56 PM Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com 
> > <mailto:xbjt...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> - checked/verified signatures and hashes
> >> - built from source code with scala 2.11 succeeded
> >> - checked that there are no missing artifacts
> >> - started a cluster, the Web UI was accessible, submitted a wordcount job
> >> and ran succeeded, no suspicious log output
> >> - test using SQL Client to submit job and the query result is expected
> >> - go through all issues which fix version property is 1.11.1, all issues
> >> are closed except FLINK-15794,
> >>   and FLINK-15794 has fixed in master and 1.11.1 just wait for being
> >> fixed in 1.10.2.
> >> - the web PR looks good
> >>
> >> For FLINK-18588,  I also agree with Timo to put it to 1.11.2 because
> >> it's  a `Major` bug rather than `Blocker`.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Leonard
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards!
> > Rui Li
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards!
> Rui Li

Reply via email to