+1 (non-binding) - checked release notes - checked signatures - built from source - submitted an example job on yarn cluster - WebUI and logs look good
Thanks, Zhu Zhu Zhijiang <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com.invalid> 于2020年7月21日周二 上午11:06写道： > +1 (binding) > > - Checked checksums and GPG files matching: OK > - Verified that the source does not contain any binaries: OK > - Checked that all the POMs point to the same version: OK > - Build the source with Maven: OK > - Review the Web PR: OK > - Checked the artifacts in repo: OK > - Execute the WordCount example by starting the cluster: Success, Web UI > OK, logs OK. > > > Best, > Zhijiang > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > From:Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> > Send Time:2020年7月20日(星期一) 19:57 > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release 1.11.1, release candidate #1 > > +1 (binding) > > - Checked diff to last RC: OK ( > https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.11.0...release-1.11.1-rc1 > ) > - All dependency related changes are properly documented > - Checked release notes: OK > - Minor: there're 2 open issues left, please remember to scope them out > if this vote passes (the website PR already excludes them) > - Checked sums and signatures: OK > - Source release > - contains no binaries: OK > - contains no 1.11-SNAPSHOT references: OK > - build from source: OK (8u101) > - mvn clean verify: OK (8u101) > - Binary release > - no examples appear to be missing > - started a cluster, WebUI reachable, several streaming and batch > examples ran successfully (11.0.4) > - Repository appears to contain all expected artifacts > - Website PR looks good > > Best Regards, > Yu > > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 18:00, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Dian for kicking off the RC. > > > > +1 from my side: > > > > I heavily tested CDC use cases end-to-end and it works well. > > > > - checked/verified signatures and hashes > > - manually verified the diff pom and NOTICE files between 1.11.0 and > 1.11.1 > > to check dependencies, looks good > > - no missing artifacts in release staging area compared to the 1.11.0 > > release > > - started cluster and ran some table examples, verified web ui and log > > output, nothing unexpected > > - started cluster to run e2e SQL queries with millions of records with > > Kafka, MySQL, Elasticsearch as sources/lookup/sinks. Works well and the > > results are as expected. > > - use SQL CLI to read from Kafka with debezium data, and MySQL binlog > > source, and write into MySQL and Elasticsearch. Nothing unexpected > > - review the release PR > > > > Best, > > Jark > > > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 13:55, Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Dian > > > > > > Thanks for the information. > > > > > > Best, > > > Congxian > > > > > > > > > Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 于2020年7月20日周一 上午11:44写道： > > > > > > > Hi Congxian, > > > > > > > > FLINK-18544 was to fix an issue introduced in 1.11.1 and so it should > > not > > > > appear in the release note according to the release guide[1]. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Creating+a+Flink+Release#CreatingaFlinkRelease-ReviewReleaseNotesinJIRA > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Creating+a+Flink+Release#CreatingaFlinkRelease-ReviewReleaseNotesinJIRA > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Dian > > > > > > > > > 在 2020年7月20日，上午11:32，Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > - checked the checksum and signature > > > > > - installed PyFlink package on MacOS and run some tests > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Dian > > > > > > > > > >> 在 2020年7月20日，上午11:11，Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com > <mailto: > > > > qcx978132...@gmail.com>> 写道： > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 （non-binding) > > > > >> > > > > >> I found that the fix version of FLINK-18544 is 1.11.1, and the > > release > > > > did not contain it. I think we should fix it in the release note. > > > > >> > > > > >> checked > > > > >> - build from source, ok > > > > >> - sha512 sum, ok > > > > >> - gpg key, ok > > > > >> - License seem ok(checked the change of all pom.xml between 1.11.0 > > and > > > > 1.11.1 > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.11.0..release-1.11.1-rc1 > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.11.0..release-1.11.1-rc1 > > > > > > > > > >> - Run some demo locally > > > > >> > > > > >> Best, > > > > >> Congxian > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> Rui Li <lirui.fu...@gmail.com <mailto:lirui.fu...@gmail.com>> > > > > 于2020年7月18日周六 下午7:04写道： > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > >> > > > > >> - Built from source > > > > >> - Verified hive connector tests for all hive versions > > > > >> - Played some simple cases with hive connector and everything > seems > > > fine > > > > >> > > > > >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:24 AM Rui Li <lirui.fu...@gmail.com > > > <mailto: > > > > lirui.fu...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > OK, I agree FLINK-18588 can wait for the next release. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:56 PM Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com > > > > <mailto:xbjt...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> - checked/verified signatures and hashes > > > > >> >> - built from source code with scala 2.11 succeeded > > > > >> >> - checked that there are no missing artifacts > > > > >> >> - started a cluster, the Web UI was accessible, submitted a > > > > wordcount job > > > > >> >> and ran succeeded, no suspicious log output > > > > >> >> - test using SQL Client to submit job and the query result is > > > > expected > > > > >> >> - go through all issues which fix version property is 1.11.1, > all > > > > issues > > > > >> >> are closed except FLINK-15794, > > > > >> >> and FLINK-15794 has fixed in master and 1.11.1 just wait for > > > being > > > > >> >> fixed in 1.10.2. > > > > >> >> - the web PR looks good > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> For FLINK-18588, I also agree with Timo to put it to 1.11.2 > > > because > > > > >> >> it's a `Major` bug rather than `Blocker`. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Best, > > > > >> >> Leonard > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > Best regards! > > > > >> > Rui Li > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Best regards! > > > > >> Rui Li > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
