+1

> On 18 May 2020, at 10:43, Canbin Zheng <felixzhen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> Regards,
> Canbin Zheng
> 
> Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2020年5月18日周一 下午4:40写道:
> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:02 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:47 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you~
>>>> 
>>>> Xintong Song
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Leonard Xu
>>>>>> 在 2020年5月17日,00:30,Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Zhu Zhu
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午11:18写道:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yun Tang
>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <libenc...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00
>>>>>>> To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API
>>> and
>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Piotrek
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this
>>> is a
>>>>>>>>> development-oriented vote?)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Minor:
>>>>>>>>> bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible
>>> to
>>>>>>> x.y.v
>>>>>>>>> with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes.
>>>>>>>>> I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility
>>>> instead
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> forward?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Yu
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Definitely +1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Dian
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com>
>> 写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Congxian
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yangze Guo <karma...@gmail.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yangze Guo
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <
>>>> yuanmei.w...@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <
>> u...@apache.org
>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang <
>>>>>>>>>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .invalid>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes
>>> are
>>>>>>> API
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and
>> x.y.v)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <
>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing
>> API
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix
>>>>>>> releases
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to
>>> guarantee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary
>>>> compatible
>>>>>>>>>>>>> across
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that
>> a
>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>> x.y.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @PublicEvolving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> classes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees
>>> (please
>>>>>>>>>> provide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific comments)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
>> adopted
>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> majority
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Jeff Zhang
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking
>>>>> University
>>>>>>> Tel:+86-15650713730
>>>>>>> Email: libenc...@gmail.com; libenc...@pku.edu.cn
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to