+1 On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:47 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > Thank you~ > > Xintong Song > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best, > > Leonard Xu > > > 在 2020年5月17日，00:30，Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Zhu Zhu > > > > > > Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午11:18写道： > > > > > >> > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> Yun Tang > > >> ________________________________ > > >> From: Benchao Li <libenc...@gmail.com> > > >> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00 > > >> To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and > > >> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > >> > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道： > > >> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> Piotrek > > >>> > > >>>> On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a > > >>>> development-oriented vote?) > > >>>> > > >>>> Minor: > > >>>> bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to > > >> x.y.v > > >>>> with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. > > >>>> I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility > instead > > >> of > > >>>> forward? > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks. > > >>>> > > >>>> Best Regards, > > >>>> Yu > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Definitely +1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道： > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>> Dian > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 在 2020年5月16日，下午2:33，Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com> 写道： > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>> Congxian > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Yangze Guo <karma...@gmail.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道： > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>> Yangze Guo > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei < > yuanmei.w...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < > > >>>>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com > > >>>>>>>>>> .invalid> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >>>>>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > > >>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are > > >> API > > >>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < > > >>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API > and > > >>>>>>>> binary > > >>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix > > >> releases > > >>>>>>>> [1] I > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > > >>>>>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary > compatible > > >>>>>>>> across > > >>>>>>>>>> bug > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a > > >> version > > >>>>>>>> x.y.u > > >>>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > > >>>>>>>> @PublicEvolving > > >>>>>>>>>>>> classes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please > > >>>>> provide > > >>>>>>>>>>>> specific comments) > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted > by > > >>>>>>>> majority > > >>>>>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Best Regards > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Jeff Zhang > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> Benchao Li > > >> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking > > University > > >> Tel:+86-15650713730 > > >> Email: libenc...@gmail.com; libenc...@pku.edu.cn > > >> > > > > >
