+1 (non-binding) Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道：
> +1 > > Piotrek > > > On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a > > development-oriented vote?) > > > > Minor: > > bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to x.y.v > > with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. > > I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility instead of > > forward? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Best Regards, > > Yu > > > > > > On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Definitely +1 > >> > >> Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道： > >> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Dian > >>> > >>>> 在 2020年5月16日，下午2:33，Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com> 写道： > >>>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>> Best, > >>>> Congxian > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Yangze Guo <karma...@gmail.com> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道： > >>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Yangze Guo > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> – Ufuk > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < > >> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com > >>>>>>> .invalid> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> Zhijiang > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > >>>>>>>> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > >>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API > >> and > >>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < > >> trohrm...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Dear community, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and > >>>>> binary > >>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases > >>>>> [1] I > >>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > >>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible > >>>>> across > >>>>>>> bug > >>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version > >>>>> x.y.u > >>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > >>>>> @PublicEvolving > >>>>>>>>> classes. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > >>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please > >> provide > >>>>>>>>> specific comments) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > >>>>> majority > >>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Best Regards > >> > >> Jeff Zhang > >> > > -- Benchao Li School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University Tel:+86-15650713730 Email: libenc...@gmail.com; libenc...@pku.edu.cn
