This discussion is a follow up to the previous thread on dropping vendor-specific documentation[1].
The conversation ended unresolved on the question of what we should provide on the Apache Flink docs. The consensus seemed to be moving towards offering a table with links to 3rd parties. After an offline conversation with Robert, I have drafted a mock-up of what that might look like[2]. Please note that I included a few vendors that I could think of off the top of my head, the list in this picture is not complete but that is not the conversation we are having here. There are three competing goals that we are trying to achieve here. 1) Provide information to users that vendor support is available as it can be important in growing adoption within enterprises 2) Be maintainable by the open-source Flink community 3) Remain neutral Please let me know what you think Seth [1] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Drop-vendor-specific-deployment-documentation-td35457.html [2] https://gist.githubusercontent.com/sjwiesman/bb90f0765148c15051bcc91092367851/raw/42c0a1e9240f1c5808a053f8ff5965828cca96d5/mockup.png
