Hi Dian,

I don't want to be very strict, but I think it should be counted as
non-binding, if it comes from non apache address, yes.

Anybody should be able to verify a vote. Moreover I think this the only
way to "encourage" all committers to use their apache addresses ;)

Best,

Dawid

On 04/12/2019 10:26, Dian Fu wrote:
> Thanks for your explanation Dawid! It makes sense to me now. +1.
>
> Just one minor question: Does this mean that if a committer/PMC accidentally 
> votes using the non apache email, even if the person who summarizes the votes 
> clearly KNOWS who he/she is, that vote will still be counted as non-binding?
>
> Regards,
> Dian
>
>> 在 2019年12月4日,下午5:13,Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> 写道:
>>
>> Very sensible! +1
>>
>>> On 4. Dec 2019, at 10:02, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1.
>>>
>>> On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me first 
>>>> clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial suggestion.
>>>>
>>>> 1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as binding
>>>> 2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org
>>>>   address from voting
>>>> 3. What I said does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMCs
>>>>
>>>> What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an apache.org 
>>>> address because then the person that summarizes the votes can check in the 
>>>> apache directory if a person with that address is a committer/PMC in flink 
>>>> project. Otherwise if a committer uses a different address there is no way 
>>>> to check if that person is a committer/PMC or not. It does not mean though 
>>>> that if you vote from apache.org this vote is automatically binding. It 
>>>> just allows us to check if it is.
>>>>
>>>> To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to use an 
>>>> apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a committer or 
>>>> not. But take me (or any other committer) for example. If I use my 
>>>> non-apache address for a vote and the person verifying the vote does not 
>>>> know me and my address, it is not easy for that person to verify if I am a 
>>>> committer or not.
>>>>
>>>> Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. You can 
>>>> vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as non-binding. 
>>>> This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. However if you 
>>>> are a committer and vote from non apache address your vote will be 
>>>> non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a committer (we might 
>>>> don't know your other address).
>>>>
>>>> I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote helps, 
>>>> but it still should be verified. People make mistakes.
>>>>
>>>> I hope this clears it up a bit.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Dawid
>>>>
>>>> On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Dawid for start this discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, according 
>>>>> to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from active PMC 
>>>>> members are binding, such as product release. So an email address doesn't 
>>>>> help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it is still 
>>>>> non-binding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Dian
>>>>>
>>>>>> 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee<lzljs3620...@apache.org>  写道:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint.
>>>>>> I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email address to
>>>>>> send email.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain 
>>>>>> "binding".
>>>>>> Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket.
>>>>>> In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any suffix 
>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Jingsong Lee
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z<usxu...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dawid,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you
>>>>>>> described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email
>>>>>>> address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This 
>>>>>>> certainly
>>>>>>> applies to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by specifying
>>>>>>> either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot be
>>>>>>> enforced but serves a general guideline.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Xuefu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz<dwysakow...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think
>>>>>>>> whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate
>>>>>>>> or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC 
>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>> we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for
>>>>>>>> verifying if a vote is binding or not.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dawid
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Xuefu Zhang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "In Honey We Trust!"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
>>>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to