Hi all,

Thanks all of you for fixing issues for 1.8.2 release!
The VOTE mail thread of the first RC of 1.8.2 already brought up.
I would appreciate if you can help to check the release and VOTE the RC1.

Thanks,
Jark

On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 16:57, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I’m just running the last tests on FLINK-13586 on Travis and them I’m
> merging.
>
> Best,
> Aljoscha
>
> On 4. Sep 2019, at 07:37, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the work Jincheng!
>
> I have moved remaining major issues to 1.8.3 except FLINK-13586.
>
> Hi @Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> , is that possible to merge
> FLINK-13586 today?
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 10:47, jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the udpate Jark!
>>
>> I have add the new version 1.8.3 in JIRA, could you please remark the
>> JIRAs(Such as FLINK-13689) which we do not want merge into the 1.8.2
>> release :)
>>
>>  You are right, I think FLINK-13586 is better to be contained in 1.8.2
>> release!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jincheng
>>
>>
>> Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月4日周三 上午10:15写道:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I am very happy to say that all the blockers and critical issues for
>> > release 1.8.2 have been resolved!
>> >
>> > Great thanks to everyone who contribute to the release.
>> >
>> > I hope to create the first RC on Sep 05, at 10:00 UTC+8.
>> > If you find some other blocker issues for 1.8.2, please let me know
>> before
>> > that to account for it for the 1.8.2 release.
>> >
>> > Before cutting the RC1, I think it has chance to merge the
>> > ClosureCleaner.clean fix (FLINK-13586), because the review and travis
>> are
>> > both passed.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Jark
>> >
>> > On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 00:45, Kostas Kloudas <kklou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yes, I will do that Jark!
>> > >
>> > > Kostas
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:19 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks Kostas for the quick fixing.
>> > > >
>> > > > However, I find that FLINK-13940 still target to 1.8.2 as a blocker.
>> > If I
>> > > > understand correctly, FLINK-13940 is aiming for a nicer and better
>> > > solution
>> > > > in the future.
>> > > > So should we update the fixVersion of FLINK-13940?
>> > > >
>> > > > Best,
>> > > > Jark
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 21:33, Kostas Kloudas <kklou...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Thanks for waiting!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > A fix for FLINK-13940 has been merged on 1.8, 1.9 and the master
>> > under
>> > > > > FLINK-13941.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > Kostas
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:25 AM jincheng sun <
>> > sunjincheng...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 FLINK-13940 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13940>
>> > > is a
>> > > > > > blocker, due to loss data is very important bug, And great
>> thanks
>> > for
>> > > > > > helping fix it  Kostas!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Best, Jincheng
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Kostas Kloudas <kklou...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月2日周一 下午7:20写道:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I think this should be also considered a blocker
>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13940.
>> > > > > > > It is not a regression but it can result to data loss.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I think I can have a quick fix by tomorrow.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > > Kostas
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 12:01 PM jincheng sun <
>> > > sunjincheng...@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks for all of your feedback!
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi Jark, Glad to see that you are doing what RM should
>> doing.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Only one tips here is before the RC1 all the blocker should
>> be
>> > > > > fixed, but
>> > > > > > > > othrers is nice to have. So you can decide when to prepare
>> RC1
>> > > after
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > blokcer is resolved.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Feel free to tell me if you have any questions.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Best,Jincheng
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> 于2019年9月2日周一
>> 下午5:03写道:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I cut a PR for FLINK-13586:
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9595
>> > > > > > > <
>> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9595>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On 2. Sep 2019, at 05:03, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > +1 for a 1.8.2 release, thanks for bringing this up
>> > Jincheng!
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Best Regards,
>> > > > > > > > > > Yu
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 09:19, Thomas Weise <
>> t...@apache.org>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> +1 for the 1.8.2 release
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> I marked
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13586
>> > > for
>> > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > >> release. It would be good to compensate for the
>> backward
>> > > > > > > incompatible
>> > > > > > > > > >> change to ClosureCleaner that was introduced in 1.8.1,
>> > which
>> > > > > affects
>> > > > > > > > > >> downstream dependencies.
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >> Thomas
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:10 PM jincheng sun <
>> > > > > > > sunjincheng...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Hi Jark,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Glad to hear that you want to be the Release Manager
>> of
>> > > flink
>> > > > > > > 1.8.2.
>> > > > > > > > > >>> I believe that you will be a great RM, and I am very
>> > > willing to
>> > > > > > > help
>> > > > > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > > > >>> with the final release in the final stages. :)
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> The release of Apache Flink involves a number of
>> tasks.
>> > For
>> > > > > > > details,
>> > > > > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > > > >>> can consult the documentation [1]. If you have any
>> > > questions,
>> > > > > > > please
>> > > > > > > > > let
>> > > > > > > > > >> me
>> > > > > > > > > >>> know and let us work together.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Creating+a+Flink+Release#CreatingaFlinkRelease-Checklisttoproceedtothenextstep.1
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Jincheng
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2019年8月31日周六
>> > > 上午12:59写道:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> +1 for a 1.8.2 bug fix release. Thanks for kicking
>> this
>> > > > > > > discussion off
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Jincheng.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Till
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 6:45 PM Jark Wu <
>> > imj...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks Jincheng for bringing this up.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> +1 to the 1.8.2 release, because it already
>> contains a
>> > > > > couple of
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> important
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> fixes and it has been a long time since 1.8.1 came
>> out.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> I'm willing to help the community as much as
>> possible.
>> > > I'm
>> > > > > > > wondering
>> > > > > > > > > >>> if I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> can be the release manager of 1.8.2 or work with you
>> > > together
>> > > > > > > > > >>> @Jincheng?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Best,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jark
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 18:58, Hequn Cheng <
>> > > > > chenghe...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Hi Jincheng,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> +1 for a 1.8.2 release.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks a lot for raising the discussion. It would
>> be
>> > > nice to
>> > > > > > > have
>> > > > > > > > > >>> these
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> critical fixes.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Best, Hequn
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 6:31 PM Maximilian Michels
>> <
>> > > > > > > m...@apache.org
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi Jincheng,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> +1 I would be for a 1.8.2 release such that we can
>> > fix
>> > > the
>> > > > > > > > > >> problems
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> with
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the nested closure cleaner which currently block
>> > 1.8.1
>> > > > > users
>> > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Beam:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13367
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Max
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On 30.08.19 11:25, jincheng sun wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi Flink devs,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> It has been nearly 2 months since the 1.8.1
>> > released.
>> > > So,
>> > > > > what
>> > > > > > > > > >> do
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> you
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> think
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> about releasing Flink 1.8.2 soon?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We already have some blocker and critical fixes
>> in
>> > the
>> > > > > > > > > >>> release-1.8
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> branch:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [Blocker]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-13159 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException
>> when
>> > > > > restore
>> > > > > > > job
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-10368 'Kerberized YARN on Docker test'
>> > > unstable
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-12578 Use secure URLs for Maven
>> repositories
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [Critical]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-12736 ResourceManager may release TM with
>> > > > > allocated
>> > > > > > > > > >> slots
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-12889 Job keeps in FAILING state
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-13484 ConnectedComponents end-to-end test
>> > > instable
>> > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> NoResourceAvailableException
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-13508
>> CommonTestUtils#waitUntilCondition()
>> > may
>> > > > > attempt
>> > > > > > > > > >> to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> sleep
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> with negative time
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-13806 Metric Fetcher floods the JM log
>> with
>> > > errors
>> > > > > > > when
>> > > > > > > > > >>> TM
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> is
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> lost
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Furthermore, I think the following one blocker
>> issue
>> > > > > should be
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> merged
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> before 1.8.2 release.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-13897: OSS FS NOTICE file is placed in
>> wrong
>> > > > > directory
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> It would also be great if we can have the fix of
>> > > > > > > > > >> Elasticsearch6.x
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> connector
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> threads leaking (FLINK-13689) in 1.8.2 release
>> which
>> > > is
>> > > > > > > > > >>> identified
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> as
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> major.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Please let me know what you think?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jincheng
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to