+1 FLINK-13940 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13940> is a
blocker, due to loss data is very important bug, And great thanks for
helping fix it  Kostas!

Best, Jincheng

Kostas Kloudas <kklou...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月2日周一 下午7:20写道:

> Hi all,
>
> I think this should be also considered a blocker
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13940.
> It is not a regression but it can result to data loss.
>
> I think I can have a quick fix by tomorrow.
>
> Cheers,
> Kostas
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 12:01 PM jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for all of your feedback!
> >
> > Hi Jark, Glad to see that you are doing what RM should doing.
> >
> > Only one tips here is before the RC1 all the blocker should be fixed, but
> > othrers is nice to have. So you can decide when to prepare RC1 after the
> > blokcer is resolved.
> >
> > Feel free to tell me if you have any questions.
> >
> > Best,Jincheng
> >
> > Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> 于2019年9月2日周一 下午5:03写道:
> >
> > > I cut a PR for FLINK-13586: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9595
> <
> > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9595>
> > >
> > > > On 2. Sep 2019, at 05:03, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 for a 1.8.2 release, thanks for bringing this up Jincheng!
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Yu
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 09:19, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 for the 1.8.2 release
> > > >>
> > > >> I marked https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13586 for this
> > > >> release. It would be good to compensate for the backward
> incompatible
> > > >> change to ClosureCleaner that was introduced in 1.8.1, which affects
> > > >> downstream dependencies.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Thomas
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:10 PM jincheng sun <
> sunjincheng...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Jark,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Glad to hear that you want to be the Release Manager of flink
> 1.8.2.
> > > >>> I believe that you will be a great RM, and I am very willing to
> help
> > > you
> > > >>> with the final release in the final stages. :)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The release of Apache Flink involves a number of tasks. For
> details,
> > > you
> > > >>> can consult the documentation [1]. If you have any questions,
> please
> > > let
> > > >> me
> > > >>> know and let us work together.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Creating+a+Flink+Release#CreatingaFlinkRelease-Checklisttoproceedtothenextstep.1
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Cheers,
> > > >>> Jincheng
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2019年8月31日周六 上午12:59写道:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +1 for a 1.8.2 bug fix release. Thanks for kicking this
> discussion off
> > > >>>> Jincheng.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>> Till
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 6:45 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks Jincheng for bringing this up.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> +1 to the 1.8.2 release, because it already contains a couple of
> > > >>>> important
> > > >>>>> fixes and it has been a long time since 1.8.1 came out.
> > > >>>>> I'm willing to help the community as much as possible. I'm
> wondering
> > > >>> if I
> > > >>>>> can be the release manager of 1.8.2 or work with you together
> > > >>> @Jincheng?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>> Jark
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 18:58, Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hi Jincheng,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 for a 1.8.2 release.
> > > >>>>>> Thanks a lot for raising the discussion. It would be nice to
> have
> > > >>> these
> > > >>>>>> critical fixes.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Best, Hequn
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 6:31 PM Maximilian Michels <
> m...@apache.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Hi Jincheng,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> +1 I would be for a 1.8.2 release such that we can fix the
> > > >> problems
> > > >>>>> with
> > > >>>>>>> the nested closure cleaner which currently block 1.8.1 users
> with
> > > >>>> Beam:
> > > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13367
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>> Max
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 30.08.19 11:25, jincheng sun wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> Hi Flink devs,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> It has been nearly 2 months since the 1.8.1 released. So, what
> > > >> do
> > > >>>> you
> > > >>>>>>> think
> > > >>>>>>>> about releasing Flink 1.8.2 soon?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> We already have some blocker and critical fixes in the
> > > >>> release-1.8
> > > >>>>>>> branch:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> [Blocker]
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-13159 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException when restore
> job
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-10368 'Kerberized YARN on Docker test' unstable
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-12578 Use secure URLs for Maven repositories
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> [Critical]
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-12736 ResourceManager may release TM with allocated
> > > >> slots
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-12889 Job keeps in FAILING state
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-13484 ConnectedComponents end-to-end test instable
> with
> > > >>>>>>>> NoResourceAvailableException
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-13508 CommonTestUtils#waitUntilCondition() may attempt
> > > >> to
> > > >>>>> sleep
> > > >>>>>>>> with negative time
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-13806 Metric Fetcher floods the JM log with errors
> when
> > > >>> TM
> > > >>>> is
> > > >>>>>>> lost
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Furthermore, I think the following one blocker issue should be
> > > >>>> merged
> > > >>>>>>>> before 1.8.2 release.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-13897: OSS FS NOTICE file is placed in wrong directory
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> It would also be great if we can have the fix of
> > > >> Elasticsearch6.x
> > > >>>>>>> connector
> > > >>>>>>>> threads leaking (FLINK-13689) in 1.8.2 release which is
> > > >>> identified
> > > >>>> as
> > > >>>>>>> major.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Please let me know what you think?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>> Jincheng
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to