+1 (binding) Best, Kurt
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:34 AM Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > But I have a minor question about "code change" action, for those > "[hotfix]" github pull requests [1], the dev mailing list would not be > notified currently. I think we should change the description of this action. > > > [1] > https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html#code-contribution-process > > Best > Yun Tang > ________________________________ > From: JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com.INVALID> > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 23:56 > To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Flink Project Bylaws > > +1 (non-binding) > Thanks Becket. > I've learned a lot from current bylaws. > > Best, > Jingsong Lee > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > From:Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> > Send Time:2019年8月13日(星期二) 17:48 > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Flink Project Bylaws > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks for the efforts Becket! > > Best Regards, > Yu > > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 16:09, Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thank you~ > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:48 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:47 PM Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks everyone for voting. > > > > > > > > For those who have already voted, just want to bring this up to your > > > > attention that there is a minor clarification to the bylaws wiki this > > > > morning. The change is in bold format below: > > > > > > > > one +1 from a committer followed by a Lazy approval (not counting the > > > vote > > > > > of the contributor), moving to lazy majority if a -1 is received. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that this implies that committers can +1 their own commits and > > merge > > > > > right away. *However, the committe**rs should use their best > > judgement > > > to > > > > > respect the components expertise and ongoing development plan.* > > > > > > > > > > > > This addition does not really change anything the bylaws meant to > set. > > It > > > > is simply a clarification. If anyone who have casted the vote > objects, > > > > please feel free to withdraw the vote. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:29 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > On 13 Aug 2019, at 13:22, vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> 于2019年8月13日周二 > 下午6:32写道： > > > > > > > > > > > >> +1 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 12:31 PM Hequn Cheng < > chenghe...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Thanks a lot for driving this! Good job. @Becket Qin < > > > > > >> becket....@gmail.com > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Best, Hequn > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:26 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> +1 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:22 PM Maximilian Michels < > > > m...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> +1 It's good that we formalize this. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On 13.08.19 10:41, Fabian Hueske wrote: > > > > > >>>>>> +1 for the proposed bylaws. > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for pushing this Becket! > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Cheers, Fabian > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Am Mo., 12. Aug. 2019 um 16:31 Uhr schrieb Robert Metzger < > > > > > >>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org>: > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> I changed the permissions of the page. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:21 PM Till Rohrmann < > > > > > >>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> +1 for the proposal. Thanks a lot for driving this > > discussion > > > > > >>>> Becket! > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>>>>>> Till > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:02 PM Becket Qin < > > > > > >> becket....@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Robert, > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> That's a good suggestion. Will you help to change the > > > > > >> permission > > > > > >>> on > > > > > >>>>>>> that > > > > > >>>>>>>>> page? > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:41 PM Robert Metzger < > > > > > >>>> rmetz...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting the vote. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> How about putting a specific version in the wiki up for > > > > > >> voting, > > > > > >>> or > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> restricting edit access to the page to the PMC? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> There were already two changes (very minor) to the page > > > since > > > > > >>> the > > > > > >>>>>>> vote > > > > > >>>>>>>>> has > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> started: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?pageId=120731026 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I suggest to restrict edit access to the page. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:43 AM Timo Walther < > > > > > >>> twal...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all the efforts you put into this for > > > documenting > > > > > >>> how > > > > > >>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> project operates. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Timo > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Am 12.08.19 um 10:44 schrieb Aljoscha Krettek: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11. Aug 2019, at 10:07, Becket Qin < > > > > > >> becket....@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to start a voting thread on the project > > > bylaws > > > > > >>> of > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Flink. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> It > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> aims to help the community coordinate more smoothly. > > > Please > > > > > >>> see > > > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> bylaws > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki page below for details. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion thread is following: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Flink-project-bylaws-td30409.html > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 6 days. PMC > members' > > > > > >> votes > > > > > >>>>>>> are > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> considered as binding. The vote requires 2/3 majority > > of > > > > > >> the > > > > > >>>>>>>> binding > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1s to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
