Ah, I see. The fix for that has been merged into master so it will be release 
in Flink 1.3.

> On 28. Apr 2017, at 13:50, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
> 
> Sorry, you're right Aljosha..the issue number is correct, the link is
> wrong! The correct one is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6398
> 
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> I think there might be a typo. We haven’t yet reached issue number 6389,
>> if I’m not mistaken. The latest as I’m writing this is 6410.
>> 
>>> On 28. Apr 2017, at 10:00, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If it's not a problem it will be great for us to include also FLINK-6398
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6938> if it's not a big
>> deal
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Flavio
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Zhuoluo Yang <
>> zhuoluo....@alibaba-inc.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Devs,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the release plan.
>>>> 
>>>> Could you also please add the feature FLINK-6196
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6196> Support dynamic
>> schema
>>>> in Table Function?
>>>> I’d like to update the code as comments left on PR today.
>>>> I will try to make sure the code is updated before the Apr 30th.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Zhuoluo 😀
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 在 2017年4月28日,上午8:48,Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for starting this thread. It would be great to see the following
>>>> features available in Flink 1.3:
>>>> 
>>>> * Support for complex schema: FLINK-6033, FLINK-6377
>>>> * Various improvements on SQL over group windows: FLINK-6335, FLINK-6373
>>>> * StreamTableSink for JDBC and Cassandra: FLINK-6281, FLINK-6225
>>>> * Decoupling Flink and Hadoop: FLINK-5998
>>>> 
>>>> All of them have gone through at least one round of review so I'm
>>>> optimistic that they can make it to 1.3 in a day or two.
>>>> 
>>>> Additionally it would be great to see FLINK-6232 go in, but it depends
>> on
>>>> FLINK-5884 so it might be a little bit tough.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Haohui
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:22 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> FLINK-5892 (Restoring state by operator) is also nearing completion, but
>>>> with only 1 day left before the weekend we're cutting it really short.
>>>> 
>>>> Since this eliminates a major pain point when updating jobs, as it
>>>> allows the modification of chains, another day or 2 would be good i
>> think.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Chesnay
>>>> 
>>>> On 27.04.2017 18:55, Bowen Li wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Ufuk,
>>>>    I'd like to get FLINK-6013 (Adding Datadog Http metrics reporter)
>>>> 
>>>> into
>>>> 
>>>> release 1.3. It's in the final state of code review in
>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3736
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Bowen
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) <
>>>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Ufuk,
>>>> Thank you for launching this topic!
>>>> I wish my latest refinement of buffer provider (
>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/
>>>> 
>>>> jira/browse/FLINK-6337)  to be included in 1.3 and most of the jobs can
>>>> get benefit from it. And I think it can be completed with the help of
>>>> 
>>>> your
>>>> 
>>>> reviews this week.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,Zhijiang---------------------------------------------
>>>> ---------------------发件人:Ufuk
>>>> 
>>>> Celebi <u...@apache.org>发送时间:2017年4月27日(星期四) 22:25收件人:dev <
>>>> dev@flink.apache.org>抄 送:Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>主
>>>> 题:[DISCUSS] Feature Freeze
>>>> Hey devs! :-)
>>>> 
>>>> We decided to follow a time-based release model with the upcoming 1.3
>>>> release and the planned feature freeze is on Monday, May 1st.
>>>> 
>>>> I wanted to start a discussion to get a quick overview of the current
>>>> state of things.
>>>> 
>>>> - Is everyone on track and aware of the feature freeze? ;)
>>>> - Are there any major features we want in 1.3 that
>>>> have not been merged yet?
>>>> - Do we need to extend the feature freeze, because of an
>>>> important feature?
>>>> 
>>>> Would be great to gather a list of features/PRs that we want in the
>>>> 1.3 release. This could be a good starting point for the release
>>>> manager (@Robert?).
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> 
>>>> Ufuk
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to