Hi Devs,

Thanks for the release plan.

Could you also please add the feature FLINK-6196 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6196> Support dynamic schema in 
Table Function?
I’d like to update the code as comments left on PR today.
I will try to make sure the code is updated before the Apr 30th.


Thanks,

Zhuoluo 😀





> 在 2017年4月28日,上午8:48,Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Thanks for starting this thread. It would be great to see the following
> features available in Flink 1.3:
> 
> * Support for complex schema: FLINK-6033, FLINK-6377
> * Various improvements on SQL over group windows: FLINK-6335, FLINK-6373
> * StreamTableSink for JDBC and Cassandra: FLINK-6281, FLINK-6225
> * Decoupling Flink and Hadoop: FLINK-5998
> 
> All of them have gone through at least one round of review so I'm
> optimistic that they can make it to 1.3 in a day or two.
> 
> Additionally it would be great to see FLINK-6232 go in, but it depends on
> FLINK-5884 so it might be a little bit tough.
> 
> Regards,
> Haohui
> 
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:22 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> FLINK-5892 (Restoring state by operator) is also nearing completion, but
>> with only 1 day left before the weekend we're cutting it really short.
>> 
>> Since this eliminates a major pain point when updating jobs, as it
>> allows the modification of chains, another day or 2 would be good i think.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Chesnay
>> 
>> On 27.04.2017 18:55, Bowen Li wrote:
>>> Hi Ufuk,
>>>      I'd like to get FLINK-6013 (Adding Datadog Http metrics reporter)
>> into
>>> release 1.3. It's in the final state of code review in
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3736
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bowen
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) <
>>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Ufuk,
>>>> Thank you for launching this topic!
>>>> I wish my latest refinement of buffer provider (
>> https://issues.apache.org/
>>>> jira/browse/FLINK-6337)  to be included in 1.3 and most of the jobs can
>>>> get benefit from it. And I think it can be completed with the help of
>> your
>>>> reviews this week.
>>>> 
>> Cheers,Zhijiang------------------------------------------------------------------发件人:Ufuk
>>>> Celebi <u...@apache.org>发送时间:2017年4月27日(星期四) 22:25收件人:dev <
>>>> dev@flink.apache.org>抄 送:Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>主
>>>> 题:[DISCUSS] Feature Freeze
>>>> Hey devs! :-)
>>>> 
>>>> We decided to follow a time-based release model with the upcoming 1.3
>>>> release and the planned feature freeze is on Monday, May 1st.
>>>> 
>>>> I wanted to start a discussion to get a quick overview of the current
>>>> state of things.
>>>> 
>>>> - Is everyone on track and aware of the feature freeze? ;)
>>>> - Are there any major features we want in 1.3 that
>>>> have not been merged yet?
>>>> - Do we need to extend the feature freeze, because of an
>>>> important feature?
>>>> 
>>>> Would be great to gather a list of features/PRs that we want in the
>>>> 1.3 release. This could be a good starting point for the release
>>>> manager (@Robert?).
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> 
>>>> Ufuk
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to