Hi Ufuk Incremental checkpointing can significantly improve the performance of checkpointing. I hope it can be included in release 1.3.
I am working with Stefan on the last subtask, which attempts to implement incremental checkpointing in RocksDB state backend (FLINK-6364). Without future optimizations, the work is near completion. So i think 2-3 more days would be good. Regards Xiaogang > 在 2017年4月28日,上午3:22,Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> 写道: > > Hello, > > FLINK-5892 (Restoring state by operator) is also nearing completion, but with > only 1 day left before the weekend we're cutting it really short. > > Since this eliminates a major pain point when updating jobs, as it allows the > modification of chains, another day or 2 would be good i think. > > Regards, > Chesnay > > On 27.04.2017 18:55, Bowen Li wrote: >> Hi Ufuk, >> I'd like to get FLINK-6013 (Adding Datadog Http metrics reporter) into >> release 1.3. It's in the final state of code review in >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3736 >> >> Thanks, >> Bowen >> >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) < >> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ufuk, >>> Thank you for launching this topic! >>> I wish my latest refinement of buffer provider (https://issues.apache.org/ >>> jira/browse/FLINK-6337) to be included in 1.3 and most of the jobs can >>> get benefit from it. And I think it can be completed with the help of your >>> reviews this week. >>> Cheers,Zhijiang------------------------------------------------------------------发件人:Ufuk >>> Celebi <u...@apache.org>发送时间:2017年4月27日(星期四) 22:25收件人:dev < >>> dev@flink.apache.org>抄 送:Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>主 >>> 题:[DISCUSS] Feature Freeze >>> Hey devs! :-) >>> >>> We decided to follow a time-based release model with the upcoming 1.3 >>> release and the planned feature freeze is on Monday, May 1st. >>> >>> I wanted to start a discussion to get a quick overview of the current >>> state of things. >>> >>> - Is everyone on track and aware of the feature freeze? ;) >>> - Are there any major features we want in 1.3 that >>> have not been merged yet? >>> - Do we need to extend the feature freeze, because of an >>> important feature? >>> >>> Would be great to gather a list of features/PRs that we want in the >>> 1.3 release. This could be a good starting point for the release >>> manager (@Robert?). >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Ufuk >>> >