Hi Ufuk

Incremental checkpointing can significantly improve the performance of 
checkpointing.
I hope it can be included in release 1.3.

I am working with Stefan on the last subtask, which attempts to implement 
incremental checkpointing in RocksDB state backend (FLINK-6364). 
Without future optimizations, the work is near completion. So i think 2-3 more 
days would be good.

Regards
Xiaogang

> 在 2017年4月28日,上午3:22,Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> 写道:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> FLINK-5892 (Restoring state by operator) is also nearing completion, but with 
> only 1 day left before the weekend we're cutting it really short.
> 
> Since this eliminates a major pain point when updating jobs, as it allows the 
> modification of chains, another day or 2 would be good i think.
> 
> Regards,
> Chesnay
> 
> On 27.04.2017 18:55, Bowen Li wrote:
>> Hi Ufuk,
>>      I'd like to get FLINK-6013 (Adding Datadog Http metrics reporter) into
>> release 1.3. It's in the final state of code review in
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3736
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Bowen
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) <
>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Ufuk,
>>> Thank you for launching this topic!
>>> I wish my latest refinement of buffer provider (https://issues.apache.org/
>>> jira/browse/FLINK-6337)  to be included in 1.3 and most of the jobs can
>>> get benefit from it. And I think it can be completed with the help of your
>>> reviews this week.
>>> Cheers,Zhijiang------------------------------------------------------------------发件人:Ufuk
>>> Celebi <u...@apache.org>发送时间:2017年4月27日(星期四) 22:25收件人:dev <
>>> dev@flink.apache.org>抄 送:Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>主
>>> 题:[DISCUSS] Feature Freeze
>>> Hey devs! :-)
>>> 
>>> We decided to follow a time-based release model with the upcoming 1.3
>>> release and the planned feature freeze is on Monday, May 1st.
>>> 
>>> I wanted to start a discussion to get a quick overview of the current
>>> state of things.
>>> 
>>> - Is everyone on track and aware of the feature freeze? ;)
>>> - Are there any major features we want in 1.3 that
>>> have not been merged yet?
>>> - Do we need to extend the feature freeze, because of an
>>> important feature?
>>> 
>>> Would be great to gather a list of features/PRs that we want in the
>>> 1.3 release. This could be a good starting point for the release
>>> manager (@Robert?).
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Ufuk
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to