I migrated the doc to the wiki On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Paris Carbone <par...@kth.se> wrote:
> +1 > > I like the proposal! > > Docs can work as supplementary medium to the wiki sometimes, in my view. > The wiki is definitely much preferred for tracking/archiving purposes but > it might not hurt if we sometimes also reference a doc with a somewhat > evolving prototype there. > > > On 15 Jul 2016, at 15:37, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > So far the reactions were positive towards the proposal. > > If no one objects, I am going to assume lazy consensus and mark this FLIP > > as adopted. > > > > For the process, we'll post future FLIPs in the wiki directly, rather > than > > in a Google Doc first. > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> This was my original motivation. I saw a lot of discussion on the design > >> docs I initiated but none of this was reflected on the ML. > >> > >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 17:11 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> Thank you for writing the proposal! > >>> > >>> I agree with Chesnay. I thought one of the main motivations of the new > >> FLIP > >>> process is to move the discussion onto ASF infra, to record the > decision > >>> making process on the mailing list and to make ongoing activities more > >>> visible to the community. > >>> > >>> If we want to use google docs because of the commenting features, we > >> should > >>> consider implementing a tool mirroring the comments onto the mailing > >> lists. > >>> > >>> If you want to change the FLIP process, I would suggest to move the > >>> discussion about Google Docs to the FLIP 1 thread. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> I deliberately kept it initially in the Google Doc because it is > easier > >>> to > >>>> comment. > >>>> > >>>> I would move it to the wiki once we have passed the initial discussion > >>> and > >>>> have converged (or are close to convergence) on the design. > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org > > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> shouldn't the proposal be contained in the wiki instead of > >> GoogleDocs? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 12.07.2016 19:55, Stephan Ewen wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi all! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here is the very first FLIP (FLink Improvement Proposal): Fine > >> grained > >>>>>> recovery from task failures > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It describes a proposed enhancement for reducing the work done > >> during > >>>>>> recovery. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/16S584XFzkfFu3MOfVCE0rHZ_JJgQrQuw9SXpanoMiMo > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please comment in this mail thread, or in the GoogleDoc. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best, > >>>>>> Stephan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
