+1 I like the proposal!
Docs can work as supplementary medium to the wiki sometimes, in my view. The wiki is definitely much preferred for tracking/archiving purposes but it might not hurt if we sometimes also reference a doc with a somewhat evolving prototype there. > On 15 Jul 2016, at 15:37, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > So far the reactions were positive towards the proposal. > If no one objects, I am going to assume lazy consensus and mark this FLIP > as adopted. > > For the process, we'll post future FLIPs in the wiki directly, rather than > in a Google Doc first. > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> +1 >> This was my original motivation. I saw a lot of discussion on the design >> docs I initiated but none of this was reflected on the ML. >> >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 17:11 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Thank you for writing the proposal! >>> >>> I agree with Chesnay. I thought one of the main motivations of the new >> FLIP >>> process is to move the discussion onto ASF infra, to record the decision >>> making process on the mailing list and to make ongoing activities more >>> visible to the community. >>> >>> If we want to use google docs because of the commenting features, we >> should >>> consider implementing a tool mirroring the comments onto the mailing >> lists. >>> >>> If you want to change the FLIP process, I would suggest to move the >>> discussion about Google Docs to the FLIP 1 thread. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I deliberately kept it initially in the Google Doc because it is easier >>> to >>>> comment. >>>> >>>> I would move it to the wiki once we have passed the initial discussion >>> and >>>> have converged (or are close to convergence) on the design. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> shouldn't the proposal be contained in the wiki instead of >> GoogleDocs? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12.07.2016 19:55, Stephan Ewen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all! >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the very first FLIP (FLink Improvement Proposal): Fine >> grained >>>>>> recovery from task failures >>>>>> >>>>>> It describes a proposed enhancement for reducing the work done >> during >>>>>> recovery. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16S584XFzkfFu3MOfVCE0rHZ_JJgQrQuw9SXpanoMiMo >>>>>> >>>>>> Please comment in this mail thread, or in the GoogleDoc. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Stephan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
