+1 This was my original motivation. I saw a lot of discussion on the design docs I initiated but none of this was reflected on the ML.
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 17:11 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > Thank you for writing the proposal! > > I agree with Chesnay. I thought one of the main motivations of the new FLIP > process is to move the discussion onto ASF infra, to record the decision > making process on the mailing list and to make ongoing activities more > visible to the community. > > If we want to use google docs because of the commenting features, we should > consider implementing a tool mirroring the comments onto the mailing lists. > > If you want to change the FLIP process, I would suggest to move the > discussion about Google Docs to the FLIP 1 thread. > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I deliberately kept it initially in the Google Doc because it is easier > to > > comment. > > > > I would move it to the wiki once we have passed the initial discussion > and > > have converged (or are close to convergence) on the design. > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > shouldn't the proposal be contained in the wiki instead of GoogleDocs? > > > > > > > > > On 12.07.2016 19:55, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all! > > >> > > >> Here is the very first FLIP (FLink Improvement Proposal): Fine grained > > >> recovery from task failures > > >> > > >> It describes a proposed enhancement for reducing the work done during > > >> recovery. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/16S584XFzkfFu3MOfVCE0rHZ_JJgQrQuw9SXpanoMiMo > > >> > > >> Please comment in this mail thread, or in the GoogleDoc. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Stephan > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
