Hi Flavio,

shouldn't be a problem to include these issues in the release.

Cheers, Fabian

2016-05-25 17:42 GMT+02:00 Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>:

> If it's ok for you I'd need also to merge FLINK-3901[1] and FLINK-3908[2]
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1989
> [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2007
>
> Best,
> Flavio
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > thanks for the feedback so far.
> >
> > I just went over JIRA and increased the priority of some of the issues I
> > listed (the TOP 6, out of which 1 is fixed, + FLINK-3723) to CRITICAL to
> > distinguish them from the rest.
> >
> > I found two more critical issue that should be fixed:
> > - FLINK-3971: Incorrect handling of null values in aggregation functions
> > - FLINK-3944: Reordering Cartesian products and joins to resolve the
> > Cartesian products into equi-joins.
> >
> > @Vasia: I think that FLINK-3656 is important to resolve, but I see this
> > independent of the release.
> >
> > Most of these issues are currently work in progress which is very good.
> > It would be great if those who are looking for an issue to work on would
> > consider to pick a critical one.
> >
> > Please do also open new issues if you find bugs or important improvements
> > that should be fixed for 1.1.0.
> >
> > Thanks, Fabian
> >
> > 2016-05-20 16:09 GMT+02:00 Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikala...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > @Fabian: thanks for compiling the list of issues and trying out TPC-H I
> > > think it would be nice to include the first 5 from your list in 1.1.0.
> > What
> > > about FLINK-3656 (re-working the tests)? Do we want to do this before
> the
> > > release as well?
> > >
> > > Great to see Timo willing to coordinate and Yijie willing to help!
> > > Unfortunately, I won't have much time to offer in the following months,
> > but
> > > I'll try to keep myself up-to-date :)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > -Vasia.
> > >
> > > On 20 May 2016 at 15:59, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > What are the plans for 1.1.0 release so far?
> > > >
> > > > Hey Timo,
> > > >
> > > > following the 3 months release schedule, a release would be due soon
> > > > (June 8th). My personal opinion is that exact date is probably a
> > > > little optimistic, but June sounds about right.
> > > >
> > > > We should definitely start the general release discussion. Stephan
> > > > already suggested this in another thread, so you can expect this to
> > > > happen soon.
> > > >
> > > > It's very good timing that you started preparing SQL for 1.1. That
> > > > will probably be one of the major features of 1.1. :-)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to