If it's ok for you I'd need also to merge FLINK-3901[1] and FLINK-3908[2] [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1989 [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2007
Best, Flavio On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > thanks for the feedback so far. > > I just went over JIRA and increased the priority of some of the issues I > listed (the TOP 6, out of which 1 is fixed, + FLINK-3723) to CRITICAL to > distinguish them from the rest. > > I found two more critical issue that should be fixed: > - FLINK-3971: Incorrect handling of null values in aggregation functions > - FLINK-3944: Reordering Cartesian products and joins to resolve the > Cartesian products into equi-joins. > > @Vasia: I think that FLINK-3656 is important to resolve, but I see this > independent of the release. > > Most of these issues are currently work in progress which is very good. > It would be great if those who are looking for an issue to work on would > consider to pick a critical one. > > Please do also open new issues if you find bugs or important improvements > that should be fixed for 1.1.0. > > Thanks, Fabian > > 2016-05-20 16:09 GMT+02:00 Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikala...@gmail.com>: > > > Hey all, > > > > @Fabian: thanks for compiling the list of issues and trying out TPC-H I > > think it would be nice to include the first 5 from your list in 1.1.0. > What > > about FLINK-3656 (re-working the tests)? Do we want to do this before the > > release as well? > > > > Great to see Timo willing to coordinate and Yijie willing to help! > > Unfortunately, I won't have much time to offer in the following months, > but > > I'll try to keep myself up-to-date :) > > > > Cheers, > > -Vasia. > > > > On 20 May 2016 at 15:59, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > What are the plans for 1.1.0 release so far? > > > > > > Hey Timo, > > > > > > following the 3 months release schedule, a release would be due soon > > > (June 8th). My personal opinion is that exact date is probably a > > > little optimistic, but June sounds about right. > > > > > > We should definitely start the general release discussion. Stephan > > > already suggested this in another thread, so you can expect this to > > > happen soon. > > > > > > It's very good timing that you started preparing SQL for 1.1. That > > > will probably be one of the major features of 1.1. :-) > > > > > >
