+1 for protecting all branches including master. > On Jan 14, 2016, at 1:20 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 on protecting the master >> On 13 Jan 2016, at 14:46, Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On 01/13/2016 11:51 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote: >>>> @Stephan: You mean all tags should be protected, not only those under >>> rel? >>>> >>>> 2016-01-13 11:43 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>>> +1 for protecting the master branch. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Li, Chengxiang < >>> chengxiang...@intel.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 on the original style. >>>>>> Master branch disable force pushing in case of misusing and feature >>>>> branch >>>>>> enable force pushing for flexible developing. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Gyula Fóra [mailto:gyf...@apache.org] >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:36 PM >>>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for protecting the master branch. >>>>>> >>>>>> I also don't see any reason why anyone should force push there >>>>>> >>>>>> Gyula >>>>>> >>>>>> Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2016. jan. 13., >>>>> Sze, >>>>>> 11:07): >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everybody, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lately, ASF Infra has changed the write permissions of all Git >>>>>>> repositories twice. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Originally, it was not possible to force into the master branch. >>>>>>> A few weeks ago, infra disabled also force pushing into other >>> branches. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now, this has changed again after the issue was discussed with the ASF >>>>>>> board. >>>>>>> The current situation is the following: >>>>>>> - force pushing is allowed on all branched, including master >>>>>>> - branches and tags can be deleted (not sure if this applies as well >>>>>>> for the master branch) >>>>>>> - "the 'protected' portions of git to primarily focus on refs/tags/rel >>>>>>> - thus any tags under rel, will have their entire commit history." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am not 100% sure which exact parts of the repository are protected >>>>>>> now as I am not very much into the details of Git. >>>>>>> However, I believe we need to create new tags under rel for our >>>>>>> previous releases to protect them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In addition, I would like to propose to ask Infra to add protection >>>>>>> for the master branch. I can only recall very few situations where >>>>>>> changes had to be reverted. I am much more in favor of a reverting >>>>>>> commit now and then compared to a branch that can be arbitrarily >>>>> changed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you think about this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, Fabian >>>>>>>
Regards, Chiwan Park
