+1 on protecting the master
> On 13 Jan 2016, at 14:46, Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On 01/13/2016 11:51 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>>> @Stephan: You mean all tags should be protected, not only those under
>> rel?
>>>
>>> 2016-01-13 11:43 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>:
>>>
>>>> +1 for protecting the master branch.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Li, Chengxiang <
>> chengxiang...@intel.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 on the original style.
>>>>> Master branch disable force pushing in case of misusing and feature
>>>> branch
>>>>> enable force pushing for flexible developing.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Gyula Fóra [mailto:gyf...@apache.org]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:36 PM
>>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for protecting the master branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also don't see any reason why anyone should force push there
>>>>>
>>>>> Gyula
>>>>>
>>>>> Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2016. jan. 13.,
>>>> Sze,
>>>>> 11:07):
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lately, ASF Infra has changed the write permissions of all Git
>>>>>> repositories twice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Originally, it was not possible to force into the master branch.
>>>>>> A few weeks ago, infra disabled also force pushing into other
>> branches.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, this has changed again after the issue was discussed with the ASF
>>>>>> board.
>>>>>> The current situation is the following:
>>>>>> - force pushing is allowed on all branched, including master
>>>>>> - branches and tags can be deleted (not sure if this applies as well
>>>>>> for the master branch)
>>>>>> - "the 'protected' portions of git to primarily focus on refs/tags/rel
>>>>>> - thus any tags under rel, will have their entire commit history."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not 100% sure which exact parts of the repository are protected
>>>>>> now as I am not very much into the details of Git.
>>>>>> However, I believe we need to create new tags under rel for our
>>>>>> previous releases to protect them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In addition, I would like to propose to ask Infra to add protection
>>>>>> for the master branch. I can only recall very few situations where
>>>>>> changes had to be reverted. I am much more in favor of a reverting
>>>>>> commit now and then compared to a branch that can be arbitrarily
>>>> changed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think about this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best, Fabian
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>