+1 On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 > > On 01/13/2016 11:51 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote: > > @Stephan: You mean all tags should be protected, not only those under > rel? > > > > 2016-01-13 11:43 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>: > > > >> +1 for protecting the master branch. > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Li, Chengxiang < > chengxiang...@intel.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 on the original style. > >>> Master branch disable force pushing in case of misusing and feature > >> branch > >>> enable force pushing for flexible developing. > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Gyula Fóra [mailto:gyf...@apache.org] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:36 PM > >>> To: dev@flink.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs > >>> > >>> +1 for protecting the master branch. > >>> > >>> I also don't see any reason why anyone should force push there > >>> > >>> Gyula > >>> > >>> Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2016. jan. 13., > >> Sze, > >>> 11:07): > >>> > >>>> Hi everybody, > >>>> > >>>> Lately, ASF Infra has changed the write permissions of all Git > >>>> repositories twice. > >>>> > >>>> Originally, it was not possible to force into the master branch. > >>>> A few weeks ago, infra disabled also force pushing into other > branches. > >>>> > >>>> Now, this has changed again after the issue was discussed with the ASF > >>>> board. > >>>> The current situation is the following: > >>>> - force pushing is allowed on all branched, including master > >>>> - branches and tags can be deleted (not sure if this applies as well > >>>> for the master branch) > >>>> - "the 'protected' portions of git to primarily focus on refs/tags/rel > >>>> - thus any tags under rel, will have their entire commit history." > >>>> > >>>> I am not 100% sure which exact parts of the repository are protected > >>>> now as I am not very much into the details of Git. > >>>> However, I believe we need to create new tags under rel for our > >>>> previous releases to protect them. > >>>> > >>>> In addition, I would like to propose to ask Infra to add protection > >>>> for the master branch. I can only recall very few situations where > >>>> changes had to be reverted. I am much more in favor of a reverting > >>>> commit now and then compared to a branch that can be arbitrarily > >> changed. > >>>> > >>>> What do you think about this? > >>>> > >>>> Best, Fabian > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > >
