Awesome! Thanks a lot! On 12/11/2015 11:18 AM, Slim Baltagi wrote: > Hi Matthias > > I already shared your blog at Linkedin forums covering 255, 758 members! > > Big Data and Analytics 160, 316 > Hadoop Users 74,333 > Big Data, Low Latency 19,949 > Apache Storm 955 > Apache Flink 205 > > > Slim > > On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Just published it. Spread the word :) >> >> Thanks for all your valuable feedback! >> >> On 12/10/2015 01:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: >>> Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR. >>> >>> I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have >>> any more comments on the draft. >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote: >>>> Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily. >>>> >>>> On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Great post! Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> I have also made some comments in the commit. >>>>> >>>>> – Ufuk >>>>> >>>>>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Matthias, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with >>>>>> me. This one looks even better! >>>>>> >>>>>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Max >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened >>>>>>> a PR. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do >>>>>>> a second blog post later on >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote: >>>>>>>> Matthias, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is great blog! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would like to suggest the following: >>>>>>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on >>>>> Apache Flink stream processing engine? >>>>>>>> Fixing the few typos >>>>>>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons >>>>>>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility >>>>> package that allows users >>>>>>>> we need to translated it -> we need to translate it >>>>>>>> in not available -> is not available >>>>>>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar >>>>>>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus >>>>> running it on Flink. >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Slim Baltagi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos. >>>>>>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make >>>>> reviewing >>>>>>>>> it easier? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I >>>>>>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> Storm compatibility layer. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can find the draft here: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
