Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR. I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have any more comments on the draft.
-Matthias On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote: > Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily. > > On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Great post! Thanks! >> >> I have also made some comments in the commit. >> >> – Ufuk >> >>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Matthias, >>> >>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with >>> me. This one looks even better! >>> >>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Max >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened >>>> a PR. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15 >>>> >>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do >>>> a second blog post later on >>>> >>>> >>>> -Matthias >>>> >>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote: >>>>> Matthias, >>>>> >>>>> This is great blog! >>>>> >>>>> I would like to suggest the following: >>>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on >> Apache Flink stream processing engine? >>>>> Fixing the few typos >>>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons >>>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility >> package that allows users >>>>> we need to translated it -> we need to translate it >>>>> in not available -> is not available >>>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar >>>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus >> running it on Flink. >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Slim Baltagi >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article. >>>>>> >>>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos. >>>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make >> reviewing >>>>>> it easier? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I >>>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about >> the >>>>>>> Storm compatibility layer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can find the draft here: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
