Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened a PR.
https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15 @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do a second blog post later on -Matthias On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote: > Matthias, > > This is great blog! > > I would like to suggest the following: > Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on Apache > Flink stream processing engine? > Fixing the few typos > For this reasons -> For these reasons > Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility package > that allows users > we need to translated it -> we need to translate it > in not available -> is not available > eg, StormWordCount.jar -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar > Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus > running it on Flink. > Thanks > > Slim Baltagi > > On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Great, thank you for writing the article. >> >> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos. >> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing >> it easier? >> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I >>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the >>> Storm compatibility layer. >>> >>> You can find the draft here: >>> >>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md >>> >>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one: >>> >>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png >>> >>> Looking forward to your feedback! >>> >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
