I can confirm that. Sadly, the repository.apache.org server is not as cooperative as I hoped. I have everything ready for the release, except the staging repository. I hope to get it done in the next two hours.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for being the release manager. I promise the release script works > like a charm :) > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > It seems that we have merged all critical fixes into the release-0.10 > > branch. > > Since nobody else stepped up as a release manager, I'll do it again. > > It has been a while.... Lets see how the scripts have evolved ;) > > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Nice. > > > > > > I just would need to get some feedback about it -- I had to change > > > something in a "hacky way"... Maybe there is a better solution for > it... > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1387 > > > > > > I there is no better idea about solving the naming issue, I would merge > > > it into master (there is no 0.10.1 branch yet, right?) > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > On 11/20/2015 01:54 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > > > If it' not API breaking, then it can be included imo. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> If we find more bugs later on, we could have a 0.10.2, too. > > > >> > > > >> +1 for quick bug fix release. > > > >> > > > >> Question: should bug fix releases contain fixes for core components > > > >> only? I would have a fix for a bug in Storm compatibility -- not > sure > > if > > > >> it should be included or not > > > >> > > > >> -Matthias > > > >> > > > >> On 11/20/2015 12:35 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > > >>> The optimizer bug ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3052) > > > >> should > > > >>> be fixed with https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1388. > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Thanks guys, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I understand your point and you are probably right, if this is a > > > >>>> lightweight process than the earlier the better :) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Gyula > > > >>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Hey Gyula, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I understand your point, but we already have some important fixes > > for > > > >>>>> 0.10.1. It's fair to assume that we will find more issues in the > > > >> future, > > > >>>>> but the bugfix releases have way less overhead than the major > > > >> releases. I > > > >>>>> would still keep the ASAP schedule and would not wait longer > > (except > > > >> for > > > >>>>> the case that the we find an important issue that we want fixed). > > We > > > >> can > > > >>>>> always do a new bug fix release. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> – Ufuk > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Gyula Fóra < > gyula.f...@gmail.com > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Wouldnt you think that it would make sense to wait a week or so > to > > > >> find > > > >>>>> all > > > >>>>>> the hot issues with the current release? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> To me it feels a little bit like rushing this out and we will > have > > > >>>> almost > > > >>>>>> the same situation afterwards. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I might be wrong but I think people should get a chance to try > > this > > > >>>> out. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> In any case I would +1 for the quick release if everyone else > > thinks > > > >>>>> thats > > > >>>>>> the way, these are just my thoughts. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:13 AM Till Rohrmann < > > > trohrm...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Actually, I still have another bug related to the optimizer > > which I > > > >>>>> would > > > >>>>>>> like to include if possible. The problem is that the optimizer > is > > > not > > > >>>>>> able > > > >>>>>>> to push properties properly out of a bulk iteration which in > some > > > >>>> cases > > > >>>>>> can > > > >>>>>>> lead to rejected Flink jobs. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Robert Metzger < > > > >>>> rmetz...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Great, thank you! > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Let me know if there is any issue, I'll address it asap. The > PR > > is > > > >>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>> building anymore because you've pushed an update to the Kafka > > > >>>>>>>> documentation. I can rebase and merge the PR once you give me > > > green > > > >>>>>> light > > > >>>>>>>> ;) > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Till has merged FLINK-3021, so we might be able to have a > first > > RC > > > >>>>>> today. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Stephan Ewen < > > se...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Let me look at FLINK-2974 (open PR) to see if it can be > > merged... > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Robert Metzger < > > > >>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Looks like we didn't manage to merge everything today. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> (pending PRs) > > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3021 Fix class loading issue for streaming sources > > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2974 Add periodic offset committer for Kafka > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> (merged) > > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2977 Using reflection to load HBase Kerberos tokens > > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3024 Fix TimestampExtractor.getCurrentWatermark() > > > >>>>> Behaviour > > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2967 Increase timeout for LOCAL_HOST address > detection > > > >>>>>>> stratey > > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3025 [kafka consumer] Bump transitive ZkClient > > > >>>> dependency > > > >>>>>>>>>> (merged since my first email) > > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2989 job cancel button doesn't work on YARN > > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3032: Flink does not start on Hadoop 2.7.1 (HDP), > due > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>>> class > > > >>>>>>>>>> conflict > > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3011, 3019, 3028 Cancel jobs in RESTARTING state > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Is anybody volunteering to be a release manager? > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Suneel Marthi < > > > >>>>>> smar...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Flink-3017, Flink-3022, and some hotfixes u had put in over > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>> past > > > >>>>>>>>> few > > > >>>>>>>>>>> days. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Flink-3041 and Flink-3043 are pending PRs at the moment. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Till Rohrmann < > > > >>>>>>>>> till.rohrm...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> If they cover things which are also wrongly documented in > > > >>>>> 0.10, > > > >>>>>>>> then > > > >>>>>>>>>> they > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> should be merged to 0.10-release as well. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Suneel Marthi < > > > >>>>>>>>>> suneel.mar...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @Till Should the recent updates to docs/apis/ > > > >>>>>>> streaming-guide.md > > > >>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>> also > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merged to 'release 0.10'? There are other related PRs > > > >>>>>> pending. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Till Rohrmann < > > > >>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes forgot about merging them to release-0.10. Will do > > > >>>> it > > > >>>>>>> right > > > >>>>>>>>>> away. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 19, 2015 9:40 AM, "Robert Metzger" < > > > >>>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Suneel, I think > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2949 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature. The 0.10.1 release is intended as a bugfix > > > >>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>> only. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-3013 and FLINK-3036 have been merged to master > > > >>>>>> only. > > > >>>>>>>> Are > > > >>>>>>>>>>> there > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> plans > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to merge it to "release-0.10" as well? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The list of issues now looks as follows: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (pending PRs) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3032: Flink does not start on Hadoop 2.7.1 > > > >>>>> (HDP), > > > >>>>>>> due > > > >>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> class > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflict > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3011, 3019, 3028 Cancel jobs in RESTARTING > > > >>>>> state > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3021 Fix class loading issue for streaming > > > >>>>>> sources > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2974 Add periodic offset committer for Kafka > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (merged) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2977 Using reflection to load HBase Kerberos > > > >>>>>> tokens > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3024 Fix > > > >>>>> TimestampExtractor.getCurrentWatermark() > > > >>>>>>>>>> Behaviour > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2967 Increase timeout for LOCAL_HOST address > > > >>>>>>>> detection > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> stratey > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3025 [kafka consumer] Bump transitive > > > >>>> ZkClient > > > >>>>>>>>> dependency > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (merged since my first email) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2989 job cancel button doesn't work on YARN > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Ufuk Celebi < > > > >>>>>>> u...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Suneel: I think that's OK for the next major > > > >>>> release > > > >>>>>> :) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Suneel Marthi < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> suneel.mar...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be nice to have Flink-2949 in the mix, but > > > >>>> I > > > >>>>>>> won't > > > >>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>> able > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it until early next week. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Till Rohrmann < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Vasia, do you mean FLINK-3013 or FLINK-3012? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will merge PRs for FLINK-3036 and FLINK-3013 > > > >>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>> afternoon. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a timely 0.10.1 release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to add FLINK-2974 - periodic > > > >>>> kafka > > > >>>>>>>> offset > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> committer > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where checkpointing is deactivated > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Vasiliki > > > >>>>>> Kalavri > > > >>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also add FLINK-3012 and FLINK-3036 > > > >>>>>> (both > > > >>>>>>>>>> pending > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs). > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vasia. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18 November 2015 at 12:24, Robert > > > >>>> Metzger > > > >>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering whether we should release > > > >>>>>> Flink > > > >>>>>>>>>> 0.10.1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> soon, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some issues we've identified: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (pending PRs) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3032: Flink does not start on > > > >>>>> Hadoop > > > >>>>>>>> 2.7.1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (HDP), > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> due > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflict > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3011, 3019, 3028 Cancel jobs in > > > >>>>>>>> RESTARTING > > > >>>>>>>>>>> state > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3021 Fix class loading issue for > > > >>>>>>>> streaming > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sources > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2989 job cancel button doesn't > > > >>>> work > > > >>>>>> on > > > >>>>>>>> YARN > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (merged) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2977 Using reflection to load > > > >>>> HBase > > > >>>>>>>>> Kerberos > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> tokens > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3024 Fix > > > >>>>>>>>>>> TimestampExtractor.getCurrentWatermark() > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Behaviour > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2967 Increase timeout for > > > >>>>> LOCAL_HOST > > > >>>>>>>>> address > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> detection > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stratey > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3025 [kafka consumer] Bump > > > >>>>> transitive > > > >>>>>>>>>> ZkClient > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anything else that you would like to add? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think we can manage to merge the > > > >>>>> four > > > >>>>>>> PRs > > > >>>>>>>>>> until > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the RC? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
