If we find more bugs later on, we could have a 0.10.2, too.

+1 for quick bug fix release.

Question: should bug fix releases contain fixes for core components
only? I would have a fix for a bug in Storm compatibility -- not sure if
it should be included or not

-Matthias

On 11/20/2015 12:35 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> The optimizer bug (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3052) should
> be fixed with https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1388.
> 
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks guys,
>>
>> I understand your point and you are probably right, if this is a
>> lightweight process than the earlier the better :)
>>
>> Gyula
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Gyula,
>>>
>>> I understand your point, but we already have some important fixes for
>>> 0.10.1. It's fair to assume that we will find more issues in the future,
>>> but the bugfix releases have way less overhead than the major releases. I
>>> would still keep the ASAP schedule and would not wait longer (except for
>>> the case that the we find an important issue that we want fixed). We can
>>> always do a new bug fix release.
>>>
>>> – Ufuk
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Wouldnt you think that it would make sense to wait a week or so to find
>>> all
>>>> the hot issues with the current release?
>>>>
>>>> To me it feels a little bit like rushing this out and we will have
>> almost
>>>> the same situation afterwards.
>>>>
>>>> I might be wrong but I think people should get a chance to try this
>> out.
>>>>
>>>> In any case I would +1 for the quick release if everyone else thinks
>>> thats
>>>> the way, these are just my thoughts.
>>>>
>>>> Gyula
>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:13 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Actually, I still have another bug related to the optimizer which I
>>> would
>>>>> like to include if possible. The problem is that the optimizer is not
>>>> able
>>>>> to push properties properly out of a bulk iteration which in some
>> cases
>>>> can
>>>>> lead to rejected Flink jobs.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Robert Metzger <
>> rmetz...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Great, thank you!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me know if there is any issue, I'll address it asap. The PR is
>>> not
>>>>>> building anymore because you've pushed an update to the Kafka
>>>>>> documentation. I can rebase and merge the PR once you give me green
>>>> light
>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Till has merged FLINK-3021, so we might be able to have a first RC
>>>> today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me look at FLINK-2974 (open PR) to see if it can be merged...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Robert Metzger <
>>>> rmetz...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looks like we didn't manage to merge everything today.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (pending PRs)
>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3021 Fix class loading issue for streaming sources
>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2974 Add periodic offset committer for Kafka
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (merged)
>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2977 Using reflection to load HBase Kerberos tokens
>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3024 Fix TimestampExtractor.getCurrentWatermark()
>>> Behaviour
>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2967 Increase timeout for LOCAL_HOST address detection
>>>>> stratey
>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3025 [kafka consumer] Bump transitive ZkClient
>> dependency
>>>>>>>> (merged since my first email)
>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2989 job cancel button doesn't work on YARN
>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3032: Flink does not start on Hadoop 2.7.1 (HDP), due
>> to
>>>>> class
>>>>>>>> conflict
>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3011, 3019, 3028 Cancel jobs in RESTARTING state
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is anybody volunteering to be a release manager?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Suneel Marthi <
>>>> smar...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Flink-3017, Flink-3022, and some hotfixes u had put in over
>> the
>>>>> past
>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>> days.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Flink-3041 and Flink-3043 are pending PRs at the moment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Till Rohrmann <
>>>>>>> till.rohrm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If they cover things which are also wrongly documented in
>>> 0.10,
>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> should be merged to 0.10-release as well.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Suneel Marthi <
>>>>>>>> suneel.mar...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> @Till Should the recent updates to docs/apis/
>>>>> streaming-guide.md
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>> merged to 'release 0.10'? There are other related PRs
>>>> pending.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Till Rohrmann <
>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes forgot about merging them to release-0.10. Will do
>> it
>>>>> right
>>>>>>>> away.
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 19, 2015 9:40 AM, "Robert Metzger" <
>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Suneel, I think
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2949
>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature. The 0.10.1 release is intended as a bugfix
>>>> release
>>>>>>> only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-3013 and FLINK-3036 have been merged to master
>>>> only.
>>>>>> Are
>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>> plans
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to merge it to "release-0.10" as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The list of issues now looks as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (pending PRs)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3032: Flink does not start on Hadoop 2.7.1
>>> (HDP),
>>>>> due
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> class
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflict
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3011, 3019, 3028 Cancel jobs in RESTARTING
>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3021 Fix class loading issue for streaming
>>>> sources
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2974 Add periodic offset committer for Kafka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (merged)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2977 Using reflection to load HBase Kerberos
>>>> tokens
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3024 Fix
>>> TimestampExtractor.getCurrentWatermark()
>>>>>>>> Behaviour
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2967 Increase timeout for LOCAL_HOST address
>>>>>> detection
>>>>>>>>>> stratey
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3025 [kafka consumer] Bump transitive
>> ZkClient
>>>>>>> dependency
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (merged since my first email)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2989 job cancel button doesn't work on YARN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Ufuk Celebi <
>>>>> u...@apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Suneel: I think that's OK for the next major
>> release
>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>>>>>>>>>>>> suneel.mar...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be nice to have Flink-2949 in the mix, but
>> I
>>>>> won't
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it until early next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Till Rohrmann <
>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Vasia, do you mean FLINK-3013 or FLINK-3012?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will merge PRs for FLINK-3036 and FLINK-3013
>> this
>>>>>>>> afternoon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <
>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a timely 0.10.1 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to add FLINK-2974 - periodic
>> kafka
>>>>>> offset
>>>>>>>>>>> committer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where checkpointing is deactivated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Vasiliki
>>>> Kalavri
>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also add FLINK-3012 and FLINK-3036
>>>> (both
>>>>>>>> pending
>>>>>>>>>>> PRs).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vasia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18 November 2015 at 12:24, Robert
>> Metzger
>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering whether we should release
>>>> Flink
>>>>>>>> 0.10.1
>>>>>>>>>>> soon,
>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some issues we've identified:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (pending PRs)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3032: Flink does not start on
>>> Hadoop
>>>>>> 2.7.1
>>>>>>>>> (HDP),
>>>>>>>>>>> due
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflict
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3011, 3019, 3028 Cancel jobs in
>>>>>> RESTARTING
>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3021 Fix class loading issue for
>>>>>> streaming
>>>>>>>>>> sources
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2989 job cancel button doesn't
>> work
>>>> on
>>>>>> YARN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (merged)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2977 Using reflection to load
>> HBase
>>>>>>> Kerberos
>>>>>>>>>> tokens
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3024 Fix
>>>>>>>>> TimestampExtractor.getCurrentWatermark()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Behaviour
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2967 Increase timeout for
>>> LOCAL_HOST
>>>>>>> address
>>>>>>>>>>>> detection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stratey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-3025 [kafka consumer] Bump
>>> transitive
>>>>>>>> ZkClient
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anything else that you would like to add?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think we can manage to merge the
>>> four
>>>>> PRs
>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the RC?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to