Not sure. I think I'd rather leave it as it is because it renders the normal view (when your screen is wide enough unreadable). I'd rather wait for a proper fix.
Now https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sYzdxR3RJakltM0E/view?usp=sharing Afterwards https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sSmg1ZVJ6NmlVSGs/view?usp=sharing On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes. I just made it work in firefox. It was already working in Chrome this > way. > Maybe Piotr will have a better fix later on. > > -- Sachin Goel > Computer Science, IIT Delhi > m. +91-9871457685 > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > >> @Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit >> harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions). >> However, we don't have a better fix. >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already. >> > >> > -- Sachin Goel >> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi >> > m. +91-9871457685 >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue: >> >> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's >> just >> >> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I >> >> should. >> >> >> >> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox, chrome >> >> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild flink-runtime-web >> >> followed by flink-dist first. :)] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- Sachin Goel >> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi >> >> m. +91-9871457685 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < >> >> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes. >> >>> >> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view) >> >>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and >> >>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are >> >>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed. >> >>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these >> >>> > are operator-level numbers? >> >>> > >> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel < >> sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status >> of >> >>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the >> >>> > number >> >>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for >> >>> > consistency? >> >>> > > >> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel >> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi >> >>> > > m. +91-9871457685 >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel < >> >>> sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >> >>> > > wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the >> >>> text >> >>> > in >> >>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately. >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to >> >>> > render >> >>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while >> >>> for >> >>> > the >> >>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now. >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> -- Sachin Goel >> >>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi >> >>> > >> m. +91-9871457685 >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < >> >>> > >> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different. >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> See >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing >> >>> > >>> vs. >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> -Vasia. >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long >> >>> class >> >>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job >> >>> which >> >>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct? >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column? >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel < >> >>> > sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >> >>> > >>> > wrote: >> >>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped >> >>> > around >> >>> > >>> to >> >>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant >> >>> place >> >>> > in >> >>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to >> >>> > handle >> >>> > >>> > this. >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel >> >>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi >> >>> > >>> > > m. +91-9871457685 >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < >> >>> > >>> > vasilikikala...@gmail.com >> >>> > >>> > >> wrote: >> >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/ >> >>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to: >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing >> >>> > >>> > >> . >> >>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks? >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels < >> >>> m...@apache.org> >> >>> > >>> wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The >> >>> circles >> >>> > >>> mark >> >>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the >> squares >> >>> > mark >> >>> > >>> the >> >>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job >> >>> > >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total). >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. >> >>> Which >> >>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any >> >>> > >>> difference? >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in >> for >> >>> > the >> >>> > >>> next >> >>> > >>> > >> RC. >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri >> >>> > >>> > >> > <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface. >> >>> > >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view: >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in >> >>> each >> >>> > >>> status >> >>> > >>> > >> show >> >>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different >> >>> values >> >>> > >>> than >> >>> > >>> > the >> >>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs. >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is >> >>> hidden >> >>> > >>> and I >> >>> > >>> > >> > cannot >> >>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for >> each >> >>> > >>> operator: >> >>> > >>> > >> bytes >> >>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox. >> >>> > >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia. >> >>> > >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel < >> >>> > >>> sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >> >>> > >>> > >> > wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log >> and >> >>> > >>> stdout >> >>> > >>> > tabs >> >>> > >>> > >> > for >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished >> yet. >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both. >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" < >> >>> > >>> > >> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release >> :) >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel < >> >>> > >>> > sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values. >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either. >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" < >> >>> > >>> > >> > vasilikikala...@gmail.com >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :) >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab >> >>> supposed >> >>> > to >> >>> > >>> > show? >> >>> > >>> > >> No >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same >> (operator=1, >> >>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2, >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults? >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks! >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia. >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels < >> >>> > >>> > m...@apache.org >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :) >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected >> by >> >>> the >> >>> > >>> > changes >> >>> > >>> > >> of >> >>> > >>> > >> > the >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > new >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC. >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki >> >>> Kalavri < >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we >> >>> using >> >>> > the >> >>> > >>> > >> > previous >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > one? >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks! >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian >> Michels >> >>> < >> >>> > >>> > >> > m...@apache.org> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following >> >>> candidate >> >>> > as >> >>> > >>> > Apache >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git >> >>> ) >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be >> >>> found >> >>> > >>> at: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/ >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the >> key >> >>> > with >> >>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release >> can be >> >>> > found >> >>> > >>> > at: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049 >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and >> >>> passes >> >>> > >>> if a >> >>> > >>> > >> > majority >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > of >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast. >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015. >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink >> >>> > 0.10.0 >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because >> ... >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > =================================== >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on >> top >> >>> of >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1: >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide >> default >> >>> > >>> required >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add >> >>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, >> >>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version >> >>> > artifacts >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix >> >>> unexpected >> >>> > >>> leader >> >>> > >>> > >> > address >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in >> >>> Path in >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
