Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view) while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed. Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these are operator-level numbers?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status of > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the number > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for consistency? > > -- Sachin Goel > Computer Science, IIT Delhi > m. +91-9871457685 > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the text in >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately. >> >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to render >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while for the >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now. >> >> -- Sachin Goel >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi >> m. +91-9871457685 >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < >> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different. >>> >>> See >>> >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing >>> vs. >>> >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing >>> >>> -Vasia. >>> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long class >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job which >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct? >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column? >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped around >>> to >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant place in >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to handle >>> > this. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi >>> > > m. +91-9871457685 >>> > > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < >>> > vasilikikala...@gmail.com >>> > >> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/ >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to: >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing >>> > >> . >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks? >>> > >> >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> > @Vasia: >>> > >> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles >>> mark >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares mark >>> the >>> > >> > status of a task within a job >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total). >>> > >> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any >>> difference? >>> > >> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for the >>> next >>> > >> RC. >>> > >> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri >>> > >> > <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface. >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view: >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each >>> status >>> > >> show >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values >>> than >>> > the >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs. >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden >>> and I >>> > >> > cannot >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each >>> operator: >>> > >> bytes >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox. >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > -Vasia. >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel < >>> sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >>> > >> > wrote: >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and >>> stdout >>> > tabs >>> > >> > for >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet. >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both. >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" < >>> > >> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> >>> > >> > >> wrote: >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :) >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel < >>> > sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >>> > >> > >> wrote: >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values. >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either. >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" < >>> > >> > vasilikikala...@gmail.com >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote: >>> > >> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :) >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to >>> > show? >>> > >> No >>> > >> > >> > matter >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1, >>> > >> > parallelism=2, >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults? >>> > >> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks! >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia. >>> > >> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels < >>> > m...@apache.org >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote: >>> > >> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :) >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document: >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the >>> > changes >>> > >> of >>> > >> > the >>> > >> > >> > new >>> > >> > >> > > > RC. >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri < >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the >>> > >> > previous >>> > >> > >> > one? >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks! >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels < >>> > >> > m...@apache.org> >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote: >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as >>> > Apache >>> > >> > >> Flink >>> > >> > >> > > > > version >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0: >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on: >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch: >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git) >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found >>> at: >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/ >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with >>> > >> > fingerprint >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF: >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found >>> > at: >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049 >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes >>> if a >>> > >> > majority >>> > >> > >> > of >>> > >> > >> > > at >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast. >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015. >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0 >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > =================================== >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1: >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default >>> required >>> > >> > >> > > configuration >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, >>> > >> > httpclient) to >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected >>> leader >>> > >> > address >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> >> >>
