Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes. On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view) > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed. > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these > are operator-level numbers? > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status of > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the > number > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for > consistency? > > > > -- Sachin Goel > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi > > m. +91-9871457685 > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the text > in > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately. > >> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to > render > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while for > the > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now. > >> > >> -- Sachin Goel > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi > >> m. +91-9871457685 > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < > >> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different. > >>> > >>> See > >>> > >>> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing > >>> vs. > >>> > >>> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing > >>> > >>> -Vasia. > >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long class > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job which > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct? > >>> > > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column? > >>> > > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel < > sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped > around > >>> to > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant place > in > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to > handle > >>> > this. > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi > >>> > > m. +91-9871457685 > >>> > > > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < > >>> > vasilikikala...@gmail.com > >>> > >> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/ > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing > >>> > >> . > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks? > >>> > >> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > @Vasia: > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles > >>> mark > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares > mark > >>> the > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job > >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total). > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any > >>> difference? > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for > the > >>> next > >>> > >> RC. > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri > >>> > >> > <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface. > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view: > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each > >>> status > >>> > >> show > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values > >>> than > >>> > the > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs. > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden > >>> and I > >>> > >> > cannot > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each > >>> operator: > >>> > >> bytes > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox. > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > -Vasia. > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel < > >>> sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > >>> > >> > wrote: > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and > >>> stdout > >>> > tabs > >>> > >> > for > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet. > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both. > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" < > >>> > >> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> > >>> > >> > >> wrote: > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :) > >>> > >> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel < > >>> > sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > >>> > >> > >> wrote: > >>> > >> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values. > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either. > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" < > >>> > >> > vasilikikala...@gmail.com > >>> > >> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote: > >>> > >> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :) > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed > to > >>> > show? > >>> > >> No > >>> > >> > >> > matter > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1, > >>> > >> > parallelism=2, > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults? > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks! > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia. > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels < > >>> > m...@apache.org > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> > wrote: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :) > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the > >>> > changes > >>> > >> of > >>> > >> > the > >>> > >> > >> > new > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC. > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri < > >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using > the > >>> > >> > previous > >>> > >> > >> > one? > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks! > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels < > >>> > >> > m...@apache.org> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate > as > >>> > Apache > >>> > >> > >> Flink > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git) > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found > >>> at: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/ > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key > with > >>> > >> > fingerprint > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be > found > >>> > at: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049 > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes > >>> if a > >>> > >> > majority > >>> > >> > >> > of > >>> > >> > >> > > at > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast. > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015. > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink > 0.10.0 > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > =================================== > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1: > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default > >>> required > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, > >>> > >> > httpclient) to > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version > artifacts > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected > >>> leader > >>> > >> > address > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> >
