+1 For pulling out and the restructure. Enough good arguments have been brought forward and I agree with all of them.
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 at 17:47 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 01 Oct 2015, at 16:48, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > @Chesnay: Nothing prevents projects from getting stuck there. But at > least > > we don't have two staging repositories (dist, staging). Also I would not > > say that there has been no graduation out of staging. Yarn was also there > > once, streaming and gelly are currently leaving it. So I would actually > say > > it worked. > > > > One more thing: Can we actually put the web submission client into a > > separate module until we have something new and better? > > > > It does really not fit into "flink-clients". It makes Flink users pull > the > > jetty dependencies even if they never use them for example when running > > Flink from an IDE. > > I think most people use it as part of the binary distribution and nothing > else anyways. So +1.
