+1 for the new Maven project structure +1 for removing the flink-testing-utils module +1 for moving flink-language-binding to flink-python
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 For pulling out and the restructure. Enough good arguments have been > brought forward and I agree with all of them. > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 at 17:47 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> > On 01 Oct 2015, at 16:48, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > @Chesnay: Nothing prevents projects from getting stuck there. But at >> least >> > we don't have two staging repositories (dist, staging). Also I would not >> > say that there has been no graduation out of staging. Yarn was also there >> > once, streaming and gelly are currently leaving it. So I would actually >> say >> > it worked. >> > >> > One more thing: Can we actually put the web submission client into a >> > separate module until we have something new and better? >> > >> > It does really not fit into "flink-clients". It makes Flink users pull >> the >> > jetty dependencies even if they never use them for example when running >> > Flink from an IDE. >> >> I think most people use it as part of the binary distribution and nothing >> else anyways. So +1.
