Yes. We should know, though, whether this is a Java 6 bug, or a bug in our system that just happens to occur only with Java 6 (because of different timings in this other engine)
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Chesnay Schepler < chesnay.schep...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Aren't we dropping java 6 support? > > > On 04.08.2015 12:21, Stephan Ewen wrote: > >> The "StateCheckpointedITCase" has not failed so far, which also test these >> guarantees thoroughly. >> >> But we need to first rule out the BarrierBuffer. The problem is that the >> bug occur only on Java 6 and cannot be reproduced locally... >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Honestly I don't think the partitioned state changes have anything to do >>> with the stability, only the reworked test case, which now test proper >>> exactly-once which was missing before. >>> >>> Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2015. aug. 4., K, >>> 12:12): >>> >>> Yes, the build stability is super serious right now. >>>> >>>> Here are the problems in question, and what we could do about this: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> BarrierBuffer: >>>> -------------------- >>>> Barrier Buffer tests fail in Java 6 builds. >>>> >>>> I have not found a way to diagnose that problem, yet, but if we cannot >>>> >>> find >>> >>>> the issue today, I would be willing to revert my latest commits on the >>>> barrier buffer to increase the stability. >>>> >>>> >>>> StreamCheckpointingITCase >>>> ------------------------------------------- >>>> This seems to have started with either the barrier buffer, or the >>>> updated >>>> partitioned state. If fixing/reverting the barrier buffer does not fix >>>> >>> it, >>> >>>> and no fix has come up >>>> >>>> until then, let's revert the latest changes to the partitioned state and >>>> re-add them when they are stable. >>>> >>>> >>>> Tachyon: >>>> ------------- >>>> The Tachyon mini cluster has a problem, apparently, the programs exit >>>> >>> with >>> >>>> a sysexit or segfault. >>>> >>>> Since we have no Tachyon code ourselves, do we need this test as part of >>>> the nightly tests? >>>> Can we make this a "manual" test that we trigger on demand? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Greetings, >>>> Stephan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I've also seen this fail: >>>>> >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/74025862 >>>> >>>>> in SuccessAfterNetworkBuffersFailureITCase >>>>> >>>>> Build seems quite flaky recently. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 at 10:27 Matthias J. Sax < >>>>> >>>> mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Rebased on: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink/commit/fab61a1954ff1554448e826e1d273689ed520fc3 >>> >>>> But if the gap between two rebases is large, it's hard to say what >>>>>> >>>>> the >>> >>>> problem might be... >>>>>> >>>>>> The old parent commit (ie, rebase before last rebase) was >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink/commit/148395bcd81a93bcb1473e4e93f267edb3b71c7e >>> >>>> -Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08/04/2015 08:57 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> What are the commits that you rebased on? Could you maybe narrow >>>>>>> >>>>>> down >>> >>>> what >>>>>> >>>>>>> caused the regression? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 at 23:31 Matthias J. Sax < >>>>>>> >>>>>> mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I only report failing tests after a rebase. ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 08/03/2015 11:23 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting it , Matthias. Will try to run Travis for >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> latest >>>> >>>>> Flink. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tachyon test is a bit flaky. Maybe updating to latest release >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> could >>> >>>> help. >>>>>> >>>>>>> - Henry >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Matthias J. Sax >>>>>>>>> <mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Today, not a single built was successful completely. Please see >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> here: >>>>> >>>>>> Flink Streaming Core: >>>>>>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/mjsax/flink/jobs/73938109 >>>>>>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/mjsax/flink/jobs/73951362 >>>>>>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938124 >>>>>>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73899795 >>>>>>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938122 >>>>>>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73952441 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Flink Taychon: >>>>>>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938123 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >
