The "StateCheckpointedITCase" has not failed so far, which also test these guarantees thoroughly.
But we need to first rule out the BarrierBuffer. The problem is that the bug occur only on Java 6 and cannot be reproduced locally... On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > Honestly I don't think the partitioned state changes have anything to do > with the stability, only the reworked test case, which now test proper > exactly-once which was missing before. > > Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2015. aug. 4., K, > 12:12): > > > Yes, the build stability is super serious right now. > > > > Here are the problems in question, and what we could do about this: > > > > > > > > BarrierBuffer: > > -------------------- > > Barrier Buffer tests fail in Java 6 builds. > > > > I have not found a way to diagnose that problem, yet, but if we cannot > find > > the issue today, I would be willing to revert my latest commits on the > > barrier buffer to increase the stability. > > > > > > StreamCheckpointingITCase > > ------------------------------------------- > > This seems to have started with either the barrier buffer, or the updated > > partitioned state. If fixing/reverting the barrier buffer does not fix > it, > > and no fix has come up > > > > until then, let's revert the latest changes to the partitioned state and > > re-add them when they are stable. > > > > > > Tachyon: > > ------------- > > The Tachyon mini cluster has a problem, apparently, the programs exit > with > > a sysexit or segfault. > > > > Since we have no Tachyon code ourselves, do we need this test as part of > > the nightly tests? > > Can we make this a "manual" test that we trigger on demand? > > > > > > > > Greetings, > > Stephan > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > I've also seen this fail: > > https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/74025862 > > > > > > in SuccessAfterNetworkBuffersFailureITCase > > > > > > Build seems quite flaky recently. > > > > > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 at 10:27 Matthias J. Sax < > > mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Rebased on: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/mjsax/flink/commit/fab61a1954ff1554448e826e1d273689ed520fc3 > > > > > > > > But if the gap between two rebases is large, it's hard to say what > the > > > > problem might be... > > > > > > > > The old parent commit (ie, rebase before last rebase) was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/mjsax/flink/commit/148395bcd81a93bcb1473e4e93f267edb3b71c7e > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > On 08/04/2015 08:57 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > > > > What are the commits that you rebased on? Could you maybe narrow > down > > > > what > > > > > caused the regression? > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 at 23:31 Matthias J. Sax < > > > > mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> I only report failing tests after a rebase. ;) > > > > >> > > > > >> -Matthias > > > > >> > > > > >> On 08/03/2015 11:23 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > > > > >>> Thanks for reporting it , Matthias. Will try to run Travis for > > latest > > > > >> Flink. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Tachyon test is a bit flaky. Maybe updating to latest release > could > > > > help. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> - Henry > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Matthias J. Sax > > > > >>> <mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote: > > > > >>>> Today, not a single built was successful completely. Please see > > > here: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Flink Streaming Core: > > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/mjsax/flink/jobs/73938109 > > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/mjsax/flink/jobs/73951362 > > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938124 > > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73899795 > > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938122 > > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73952441 > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Flink Taychon: > > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938123 > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> -Matthias > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
