Honestly I don't think the partitioned state changes have anything to do with the stability, only the reworked test case, which now test proper exactly-once which was missing before.
Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2015. aug. 4., K, 12:12): > Yes, the build stability is super serious right now. > > Here are the problems in question, and what we could do about this: > > > > BarrierBuffer: > -------------------- > Barrier Buffer tests fail in Java 6 builds. > > I have not found a way to diagnose that problem, yet, but if we cannot find > the issue today, I would be willing to revert my latest commits on the > barrier buffer to increase the stability. > > > StreamCheckpointingITCase > ------------------------------------------- > This seems to have started with either the barrier buffer, or the updated > partitioned state. If fixing/reverting the barrier buffer does not fix it, > and no fix has come up > > until then, let's revert the latest changes to the partitioned state and > re-add them when they are stable. > > > Tachyon: > ------------- > The Tachyon mini cluster has a problem, apparently, the programs exit with > a sysexit or segfault. > > Since we have no Tachyon code ourselves, do we need this test as part of > the nightly tests? > Can we make this a "manual" test that we trigger on demand? > > > > Greetings, > Stephan > > > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I've also seen this fail: > https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/74025862 > > > > in SuccessAfterNetworkBuffersFailureITCase > > > > Build seems quite flaky recently. > > > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 at 10:27 Matthias J. Sax < > mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Rebased on: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/mjsax/flink/commit/fab61a1954ff1554448e826e1d273689ed520fc3 > > > > > > But if the gap between two rebases is large, it's hard to say what the > > > problem might be... > > > > > > The old parent commit (ie, rebase before last rebase) was > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/mjsax/flink/commit/148395bcd81a93bcb1473e4e93f267edb3b71c7e > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > On 08/04/2015 08:57 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > > > What are the commits that you rebased on? Could you maybe narrow down > > > what > > > > caused the regression? > > > > > > > > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 at 23:31 Matthias J. Sax < > > > mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I only report failing tests after a rebase. ;) > > > >> > > > >> -Matthias > > > >> > > > >> On 08/03/2015 11:23 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > > > >>> Thanks for reporting it , Matthias. Will try to run Travis for > latest > > > >> Flink. > > > >>> > > > >>> Tachyon test is a bit flaky. Maybe updating to latest release could > > > help. > > > >>> > > > >>> - Henry > > > >>> > > > >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Matthias J. Sax > > > >>> <mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote: > > > >>>> Today, not a single built was successful completely. Please see > > here: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Flink Streaming Core: > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/mjsax/flink/jobs/73938109 > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/mjsax/flink/jobs/73951362 > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938124 > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73899795 > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938122 > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73952441 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Flink Taychon: > > > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938123 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -Matthias > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
