Yeah, always prefer to get it with consensus that VOTE I am fine with either.
- Henry On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> wrote: > The ASF press team wants to announce next week, so a 3-day vote right now > might cancel the subject line of this thread :-) > > Perhaps we can reach consensus in the DISCUSS thread or have a 24-hour vote? > > I agree with Stephan on 0.9.0.M1 (or 0.9.0-m1 or whatever), as it seems > that other open source projects are using this naming scheme. > > Kostas > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I think "Milestone" pretty much says that we have some crucial things in >> there, but not all. "Beta" in comparison, has an "immature early version" >> connotation. >> >> We are, for example, using a milestone 1 version of Jetty for the Web >> Frontend, so that is a pretty standard thing, in my opinion: >> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId> >> <artifactId>jetty-server</artifactId> >> <version>8.0.0.M1</version> >> </dependency> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Looks like we need to vote on 0.9-beta or 0.9-milestone. >> > >> > Can we find consensus whether to add a 1 after the name? -beta1 or >> > -milestone1. >> > Adding a 1 allows us to create a second beta/milestone release. >> > >> > I'm against adding a 1. >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > On 26 Mar 2015, at 11:01, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Two weeks have passed since we've discussed the 0.9 release the last >> > > time. >> > > > >> > > > The ApacheCon is in 18 days from now. >> > > > If we want, we can also release a "0.9.0-beta" release that contains >> > > known >> > > > bugs, but allows our users to try out the new features easily >> (because >> > > they >> > > > are part of a release). The vote for such a release would be mainly >> > about >> > > > the legal aspects of the release rather than the stability. So I >> > suspect >> > > > that the vote will go through much quicker. >> > > >> > > +1 for 0.9-beta >> > > >> > >>
