+1 for a beta release. So there is no feature-freeze until the RC right?
On 26.03.2015 15:32, Márton Balassi wrote:
+1 for the early release.
I'd call it 0.9-milestone1.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:
+1 for a beta release: 0.9-beta.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Paris Carbone <par...@kth.se> wrote:
+1 for an early release. It will help unblock the samoa PR that has 0.9
dependencies.
On 26 Mar 2015, at 11:44, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> wrote:
+1 for an early milestone release. Perhaps we can call it 0.9-milestone
or
so?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
wrote:
Two weeks have passed since we've discussed the 0.9 release the last
time.
The ApacheCon is in 18 days from now.
If we want, we can also release a "0.9.0-beta" release that contains
known
bugs, but allows our users to try out the new features easily (because
they
are part of a release). The vote for such a release would be mainly
about
the legal aspects of the release rather than the stability. So I
suspect
that the vote will go through much quicker.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org
wrote:
I've reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1650
because
the issue is still occurring.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
On Thursday, March 12, 2015, Till Rohrmann <till.rohrm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Have you run the 20 builds with the new shading code? With new
shading
the
TaskManagerFailsITCase should no longer fail. If it still does,
then
we
have to look into it again.
No, rebased on Monday before shading. Let me rebase and rerun
tonight.
