@Timo: No feature freeze for this, yes. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for a beta release. So there is no feature-freeze until the RC right? > > > > On 26.03.2015 15:32, Márton Balassi wrote: > >> +1 for the early release. >> >> I'd call it 0.9-milestone1. >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> +1 for a beta release: 0.9-beta. >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Paris Carbone <par...@kth.se> wrote: >>> >>> +1 for an early release. It will help unblock the samoa PR that has 0.9 >>>> dependencies. >>>> >>>> On 26 Mar 2015, at 11:44, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 for an early milestone release. Perhaps we can call it 0.9-milestone >>>>> >>>> or >>>> >>>>> so? >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Two weeks have passed since we've discussed the 0.9 release the last >>>>>> >>>>> time. >>>> >>>>> The ApacheCon is in 18 days from now. >>>>>> If we want, we can also release a "0.9.0-beta" release that contains >>>>>> >>>>> known >>>> >>>>> bugs, but allows our users to try out the new features easily (because >>>>>> >>>>> they >>>> >>>>> are part of a release). The vote for such a release would be mainly >>>>>> >>>>> about >>>> >>>>> the legal aspects of the release rather than the stability. So I >>>>>> >>>>> suspect >>> >>>> that the vote will go through much quicker. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I've reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1650 >>>>>>> >>>>>> because >>> >>>> the issue is still occurring. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thursday, March 12, 2015, Till Rohrmann <till.rohrm...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have you run the 20 builds with the new shading code? With new >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> shading >>>> >>>>> the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> TaskManagerFailsITCase should no longer fail. If it still does, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> then >>> >>>> we >>>>>> >>>>>>> have to look into it again. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, rebased on Monday before shading. Let me rebase and rerun >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> tonight. >>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >
