Marton, can you forward the first message in this thread to dev@ adding
[CANCEL] to the subject to cancel this vote? I think you did the same for
RC1.

Kostas

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The decision of the vote is to cancel this package.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Robert, yes you are right. Totally forgot about packaging the
> binaries.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Yes, there are two NOTICE files.
> > > They differ because bin and src releases require different licensing
> > > notices. (The bin NOTICE is bigger)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra <
> henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file?
> > >> Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I
> > >> believe the content is exactly the same.
> > >>
> > >> - Henry
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> > Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files
> > >> (directory
> > >> > root and in the folder for the binary distribution)
> > >> > Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <
> henry.sapu...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >> >
> > >> >> We need to use 2014-2015 [1]
> > >> >>
> > >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <
> mbala...@apache.org>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Hey guys,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and
> > also
> > >> >> bump
> > >> >> > the inception year in the pom. [1]
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
> > >> >> > Or
> > >> >> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015
> version.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
> > >> >> > [2]
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
> > >> >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <
> > >> henry.sapu...@gmail.com
> > >> >> > <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> > wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > > Yes, we need new RC.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > - H
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org
> > >> >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because
> > release
> > >> >> > votes
> > >> >> > > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
> > >> >> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another
> > vote.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change
> will
> > be
> > >> >> > > minimal.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to