The decision of the vote is to cancel this package. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert, yes you are right. Totally forgot about packaging the binaries. > > - Henry > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Yes, there are two NOTICE files. > > They differ because bin and src releases require different licensing > > notices. (The bin NOTICE is bigger) > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file? > >> Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I > >> believe the content is exactly the same. > >> > >> - Henry > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files > >> (directory > >> > root and in the folder for the binary distribution) > >> > Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <henry.sapu...@gmail.com > >: > >> > > >> >> We need to use 2014-2015 [1] > >> >> > >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html > >> >> > >> >> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <mbala...@apache.org> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Hey guys, > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and > also > >> >> bump > >> >> > the inception year in the pom. [1] > >> >> > > >> >> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE: > >> >> > > >> >> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation > >> >> > Or > >> >> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation > >> >> > > >> >> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version. > >> >> > > >> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38 > >> >> > [2] > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f > >> >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE > >> >> > > >> >> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET. > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra < > >> henry.sapu...@gmail.com > >> >> > <javascript:;>> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > Yes, we need new RC. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > - H > >> >> > > > >> >> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org > >> >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because > release > >> >> > votes > >> >> > > > are strictly tied to a revision/commit hash. > >> >> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another > vote. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will > be > >> >> > > minimal. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >
