Yes, there are two NOTICE files. They differ because bin and src releases require different licensing notices. (The bin NOTICE is bigger)
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file? > Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I > believe the content is exactly the same. > > - Henry > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files > (directory > > root and in the folder for the binary distribution) > > Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>: > > > >> We need to use 2014-2015 [1] > >> > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html > >> > >> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <mbala...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hey guys, > >> > > >> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also > >> bump > >> > the inception year in the pom. [1] > >> > > >> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE: > >> > > >> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation > >> > Or > >> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation > >> > > >> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version. > >> > > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38 > >> > [2] > >> > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f > >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE > >> > > >> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra < > henry.sapu...@gmail.com > >> > <javascript:;>> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Yes, we need new RC. > >> > > > >> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015. > >> > > > >> > > - H > >> > > > >> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release > >> > votes > >> > > > are strictly tied to a revision/commit hash. > >> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote. > >> > > > > >> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be > >> > > minimal. > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
