Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file? Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I believe the content is exactly the same.
- Henry On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files (directory > root and in the folder for the binary distribution) > Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>: > >> We need to use 2014-2015 [1] >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html >> >> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <mbala...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Hey guys, >> > >> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also >> bump >> > the inception year in the pom. [1] >> > >> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE: >> > >> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation >> > Or >> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation >> > >> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version. >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38 >> > [2] >> > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE >> > >> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET. >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com >> > <javascript:;>> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Yes, we need new RC. >> > > >> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015. >> > > >> > > - H >> > > >> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > > >> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release >> > votes >> > > > are strictly tied to a revision/commit hash. >> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote. >> > > > >> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be >> > > minimal. >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
