Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files (directory
root and in the folder for the binary distribution)
Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>:

> We need to use 2014-2015 [1]
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
>
> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <mbala...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also
> bump
> > the inception year in the pom. [1]
> >
> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
> >
> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
> > Or
> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
> >
> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
> >
> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, we need new RC.
> > >
> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
> > >
> > > - H
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release
> > votes
> > > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote.
> > > >
> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be
> > > minimal.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to