My personal opinion is that an AS Moniker will turn off a lot more
people than a JS Moniker.
I Am not a lawyer, but I suspect that if someone had a trademark on
Royale related to software, that RoyaleAS still may be considered
infringing.
On 9/14/2017 1:01 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
Don't you think guys that is too much references, regarding what Alex found?
We are writing in AS - what about emphasis this to RoyaleAS?
I'm still not sure yet whether name change convince me..
Piotr
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017, 03:35 Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote:
Wasn't Royale the beta name for some version of Flex? [Flex 2? or was
it Flex 1?]
On 9/13/2017 6:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi -
I did a quick suitable name search.
Royale might be taken by this individual’s project
https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale
Otherwise Royale in a TESS search is liquor and beauty products mostly.
There is a lot of “Clash Royale"
And there is also “Royale with Cheese” - a reference in Pulp Fiction
to what a Macdonald’s Quarter Pounder is called in Paris.
Regards,
Dave
On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net
<mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote:
Hi -
We have one alternative name - Royale
Are there others that people would like to propose?
If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale.
Regards,
Dave
On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net
<mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote:
Hi Om,
I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS.
If we want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and more
complicated VOTE counting.
Regards,
Dave
On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
<bigosma...@gmail.com <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
We could always structure the VOTE like this:
1. Royale
2. XXX
3. YYY
4. FlexJS
One vote should answer both questions.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
<piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not
change the
name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help with
porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed
name...
Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still
with
nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at
least one
day more before VOTE.
Piotr
2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki
<piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>:
+1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change.
I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to
build new
brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can
always
state
from where we have come and what was our story.
I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale"
as the
most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use
it since
it was code name of Macromedia Framework ?
Thanks,
Piotr
2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net
<mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>:
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com
<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Carlos’ argument carries weight to me.
If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it,
that’s
value I can recognize.
The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be
involved
in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around
the name.
Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do
about
mine.
A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t
want to
delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new
name can
we
try and pick one quickly?
Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning.
In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the
result then
we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time.
Regards,
Dave
Harbs
On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com
<mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really
important
for
all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project.
Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is
important in
a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we
don't
get a
fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we
explain
all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our
time,
since
this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS
projects, and
that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other
than
JS!!
(If we want in future years to make it possible).
@Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name
for
--
Piotr Zarzycki
mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557>
skype: zarzycki10
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
http://www.dot-com-it.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
203-379-0773
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
http://www.dot-com-it.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
203-379-0773
